Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Thinking Ability in Terms of Self Efficacy

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education · Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022) · pp. 272–281

DOI
10.15294/ujme.v11i3.58772
ISSN
2460-5840, 2252-6927
Published
2022-11-30
Publisher
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Mathematical thinking ability must be owned by students to solve various problems. Students are considered capable of fulfilling the indicators of mathematical thinking ability properly if they are balanced with good self-efficacy abilities. This research method is qualitative which aims to find new indicators and describe mathematical thinking ability in terms of self-efficacy and provide recommendations for teachers. The research subjects were six students from the first year of senior high school using purposive sampling. Indicators of mathematical thinking ability, include 1) Reasoning: identifying concepts and problems; 2) Generalizing: demonstrating mathematical ideas in writing and using mathematical language to express ideas correctly; 3) Critical Thinking: using representations to create mathematical models; 4) Problem Solving: planning problem solving strategies, implementing and checking results. 5) Communicating: revealing the results of problem solving. The results: 1) low self-efficacy’s students were only able to master reasoning; 2) moderate self-efficacy’s students are able to master reasoning, generalizing, and critical thinking; 3) high self-efficacy’s students are able to master all indicators. Recommendations for teachers are by giving opportunity to low self-efficacy’s students to speak in public, give appreciation for their efforts and reprimand if it doesn’t lower their confidence when they make mistakes.

Collaboration network of the authors

37 authors · 96 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Budi WaluyaAffiliation unknown2
Isnarto IsnartoAffiliation unknown2
Kartika Sari AsihAffiliation unknown2
Amin SuyitnoAffiliation unknown2
Tutik WijayantiAffiliation unknown1
Masrukhi MasrukhiAffiliation unknown1
Dita Ayu SorayaAffiliation unknown1
Mohammad AsikinAffiliation unknown1
Restyanna Yanu PratiwiAffiliation unknown1
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang1
Masriah MasriahAffiliation unknown1
St. Budi WaluyaAffiliation unknown1
Nurhadi SantosaAffiliation unknown1
Nathan HindartoState University of Semarang1
Akhmad NayazikAffiliation unknown1
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar1
Magdalena Ismia CahyaningrosAffiliation unknown1
Kaselin KaselinAffiliation unknown1
Naful Nur AiniAffiliation unknown1
Arif Budi SetyawanAffiliation unknown1
Nur MaliyaAffiliation unknown1
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang1
Ahmad Faridh Ricky FahmyAffiliation unknown1
Hardi SuyitnoAffiliation unknown1
Luthfiana RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Nur Karomah DwidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Rifky Ardhana Kisno SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Ardhi PrabowoAffiliation unknown1
Annisa Rani EviantiAffiliation unknown1
Sri RahayuHasanuddin University1
Putriaji HendikawatiAffiliation unknown1
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown1
Emi PujiastutiState University of Semarang1
Kristina WijayantiAffiliation unknown1
Zainnur WijayantoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujme/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Thinking Ability in Terms of Self Efficacy</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Shidqiya, Adiba Idlal</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sukestiyarno, Sukestiyarno</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical thinking ability must be owned by students to solve various problems. Students are considered capable of fulfilling the indicators of mathematical thinking ability properly if they are balanced with good self-efficacy abilities. This research method is qualitative which aims to find new indicators and describe mathematical thinking ability in terms of self-efficacy and provide recommendations for teachers. The research subjects were six students from the first year of senior high school using purposive sampling. Indicators of mathematical thinking ability, include 1) Reasoning: identifying concepts and problems; 2) Generalizing: demonstrating mathematical ideas in writing and using mathematical language to express ideas correctly; 3) Critical Thinking: using representations to create mathematical models; 4) Problem Solving: planning problem solving strategies, implementing and checking results. 5) Communicating: revealing the results of problem solving. The results: 1) low self-efficacy’s students were only able to master reasoning; 2) moderate self-efficacy’s students are able to master reasoning, generalizing, and critical thinking; 3) high self-efficacy’s students are able to master all indicators. Recommendations for teachers are by giving opportunity to low self-efficacy’s students to speak in public, give appreciation for their efforts and reprimand if it doesn’t lower their confidence when they make mistakes.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/58772</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ujme.v11i3.58772</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; Vol 11 No 3 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; 272-281</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-5840</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6927</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ujme.v11i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/58772/23528</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>