Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Analysis of Mathematic Creative Thinking Ability and Metacognition of Student on Probing Prompting Learning Models with Scaffolding Strategy

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 174–181

ISSN
2502-4507, 2252-6455
Published
2018-09-24
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study aimed to: (1) examine the effectiveness of the learning probing prompting model with scaffolding strategy on mathematical creative and metacognitive thinking skills, (2) examine the effect of metacognition on mathematical creative thinking skills with probing prompting model learning with scaffolding strategy, (3) describing ability on mathematical creative thinking in terms of students' metacognition with probing prompting model learning with scaffolding strategy. This research was a mixed method type with concurrent embedded design. Population in this study were students of class VII SMP Negeri 7 Semarang in the academic year of 2017/2018. The results showed that probing prompting model learning with scaffolding strategies was effective for mathematical creative and metacognitive thinking skills. Metacognition had a positive effect on mathematical creative thinking ability by probing prompting models learning with scaffolding strategies. A student with high metacognition was able to meet four indicators maximally and perfectly, while another one met one indicator well, but for the other three indicators he is able to master well, there were only a few errors. Students with middle-metacognition ability were able to meet two indicators maximally, but cannot fulfill the other two indicators. Students with low metacognition were able to fulfill one indicator maximally and could not fulfill the other three indicators.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 143 co-authorship links · 7 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Institut Teknologi Kalimantan
  • University of Surabaya
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga7
Hardi SuyitnoAffiliation unknown5
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang5
Sunarmi SunarmiAffiliation unknown5
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown5
Rochmad RochmadAffiliation unknown4
Mulyono MulyonoAffiliation unknown4
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang3
St. Budi WaluyaAffiliation unknown3
Sugiman SugimanAffiliation unknown3
Putriaji HendikawatiAffiliation unknown3
Heriyanto HeriyantoAffiliation unknown2
Riza ArifudinState University of Semarang2
Endang SugihartiState University of Semarang2
Aisyah Fany AchmaliaAffiliation unknown2
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang2
Winardi WinardiUniversity of Surabaya2
Ignasia Santi Kumala SwariAffiliation unknown2
Nikmah NurvicalestiAffiliation unknown2
BERNIKA RAHMANIA NALURITAAffiliation unknown2
Zaenuri MasturAffiliation unknown2
Alamsyah AlamsyahInstitut Teknologi Kalimantan2
Adi Nur CahyonoAffiliation unknown2
Siti NurzulifaAffiliation unknown2
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang1
Wardono WardonoState University of Semarang1
Ayu AristikaState University of Semarang1
Vena AgustinaState University of Semarang1
Bayu Rizky PratamaAffiliation unknown1
Misfalla Roudlo Putri ArdiansyahAffiliation unknown1
Safitri SafitriAffiliation unknown1
Amin YusufAffiliation unknown1
Dessy OctavianiAffiliation unknown1
Farid AhmadiAffiliation unknown1
Ari YuniastutiState University of Semarang1
Dyah Rini IndriyantiAffiliation unknown1
Yane Irna SetianingsihAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analysis of Mathematic Creative Thinking Ability and Metacognition of Student on Probing Prompting Learning Models with Scaffolding Strategy</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sulistyawati, Anita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Dwijanto, Dwijanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Walid, Walid</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aimed to: (1) examine the effectiveness of the learning probing prompting model with scaffolding strategy on mathematical creative and metacognitive thinking skills, (2) examine the effect of metacognition on mathematical creative thinking skills with probing prompting model learning with scaffolding strategy, (3) describing ability on mathematical creative thinking in terms of students' metacognition with probing prompting model learning with scaffolding strategy. This research was a mixed method type with concurrent embedded design. Population in this study were students of class VII SMP Negeri 7 Semarang in the academic year of 2017/2018. The results showed that probing prompting model learning with scaffolding strategies was effective for mathematical creative and metacognitive thinking skills. Metacognition had a positive effect on mathematical creative thinking ability by probing prompting models learning with scaffolding strategies. A student with high metacognition was able to meet four indicators maximally and perfectly, while another one met one indicator well, but for the other three indicators he is able to master well, there were only a few errors. Students with middle-metacognition ability were able to meet two indicators maximally, but cannot fulfill the other two indicators. Students with low metacognition were able to fulfill one indicator maximally and could not fulfill the other three indicators.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-09-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/26025</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research; Vol 7 No 1 (2018): December 2018; 174-181</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4507</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6455</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/26025/11568</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>