Communication in Food Science and Technology

SINTA accreditation

The accreditation history (periods and decrees) is not recorded yet, so every article is shown with the current rank.

Records per year

Metadata quality

Share of this journal’s records with each property. The tick marks the median of the 463 journals in Melola; an orange bar is at least 5 points under it. Read each bar against the others rather than as a grade.

Completeness

• Abstract 86.2%

  Articles with at least one non-empty dc:description. 25 of 29. Median of the journals: 100%.

• Keywords 0%

  Articles with at least one keyword in dc:subject. 0 of 29. Median of the journals: 33.7%.

• DOI 100%

  Articles with a DOI in dc:identifier. 29 of 29. Median of the journals: 100%.

• Licence 69%

  Articles with a Creative Commons URL in dc:rights. 20 of 29. Median of the journals: 0%.

• Language 0%

  Articles with dc:language declared. 0 of 29. Median of the journals: 100%.

• Volume and issue 100%

  Articles whose dc:source gives both volume and issue. 29 of 29. Median of the journals: 100%.

• Pages 6.9%

  Articles whose dc:source gives page numbers. 2 of 29. Median of the journals: 92.6%.

• Full-text link 86.2%

  Articles with a PDF galley link. 25 of 29. Median of the journals: 99.4%.

Validity

• DOI registered (Crossref) —

  Of the DOIs looked up in Crossref, the share Crossref knows (HTTP 200 rather than 404). Median of the journals: 79.7%. Not measured: this journal’s metadata comes from Crossref.

• Valid ISSNs 100%

  Records listing ISSNs in dc:source whose check digits are all valid. 29 of 29. Median of the journals: 100%.

• No escaped HTML 13.8%

  Records without escaped markup (e.g.  ) in the abstract. 4 of 29. Median of the journals: 91.3%. Metadata from Crossref: markup here is the JATS of the Crossref deposit, not the journal’s own.

• No broken characters 100%

  Records without U+FFFD (broken encoding) in the metadata. 29 of 29. Median of the journals: 100%.

Index coverage

• In OpenAlex —

  Articles found in OpenAlex (by DOI, or by title and year). Median of the journals: 81.2%.

• In Crossref —

  Articles found in Crossref (by DOI, or by title and year). Median of the journals: 60.9%. Not measured: this journal’s metadata comes from Crossref.

• Reference list (OpenAlex) —

  Of the works found in OpenAlex, the share with a non-empty reference list. Median of the journals: 61.5%.

• In DOAJ (per OpenAlex) —

  Articles OpenAlex reports as indexed in DOAJ (OpenAlex claim). Median of the journals: 0%.

Repository

• Endpoint available 100%

  Availability checks (Identify) that found the endpoint active. 1 of 1. Median of the journals: 100%.

• Records not deleted 100%

  Harvested records that are not marked deleted by the endpoint. 29 of 29. Median of the journals: 100%.

Repository dates

earliestDatestamp reported by the endpoint: not available (metadata from Crossref).