Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Early evidence on PIAAC-based tasks for teachers: Validity and readability insights

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 17 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 383–392

DOI
10.22342/jme.v17i2.pp383-392
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Terbit
2026-05-02
Penerbit
Indonesian Mathematical Society
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The low performance of Indonesian adults in international assessments such as the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) highlights the need to strengthen teachers’ literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving skills. Addressing this issue requires assessment tasks that are aligned with the PIAAC framework and relevant to educators’ professional contexts. This study provides early evidence on the development of PIAAC-based tasks for teachers, focusing on their validity and readability. A total of 100 tasks covering literacy, numeracy, and problem solving were designed and evaluated through expert validation and readability testing involving teachers. The validation results indicate that the tasks are generally valid, with minor revisions required in answer options, wording clarity, and computational accuracy. Readability findings show that the tasks are well understood by participants, with all evaluated aspects categorized as very good. These results provide initial empirical evidence that PIAAC-based tasks are both valid and readable for use with teachers. As a proof-of-concept, this study suggests the potential of such tasks to support the development of core competencies among educators. Further studies involving large-scale implementation, including computer-based testing environments, are needed to examine their effectiveness in practice.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 192 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 36 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sriwijaya University
  • Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Universitas Pasundan
  • IKIP Siliwangi
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Zulkardi ZulkardiSriwijaya University34
ZulkardiAfiliasi tidak diketahui29
Yusuf HartonoSriwijaya University9
Rully Charitas Indra PrahmanaUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan8
E.I Pusta SiligarAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Somakim SomakimSriwijaya University5
Hapizah HapizahSriwijaya University5
Nyimas AisyahSriwijaya University4
Duano Sapta NusantaraSriwijaya University4
Yulyanti HarismanUniversitas Negeri Padang4
SomakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ely SusantiSriwijaya University4
Darmawijoyo DarmawijoyoSriwijaya University3
Haniful MuttaqinAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
HapizahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Nendra Mursetya Somasih DwipaUniversitas PGRI Yogyakarta2
Ranni PermatasariSriwijaya University2
Arvin EfrianiUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang2
Poppy YaniawatiUniversitas Pasundan2
Dewi RawaniSriwijaya University2
Anna FauziahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Meryansumayeka MeryansumayekaSriwijaya University2
Zahra AlwiSriwijaya University2
MalalinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Irma RisdiyantiUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan2
Wahyu HidayatIKIP Siliwangi2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Early evidence on PIAAC-based tasks for teachers: Validity and readability insights</dc:title><dc:creator>Zulkardi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fauzan, Ahmad</dc:creator><dc:creator>Putri, Ratu Ilma Indra</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sagita, Laela</dc:creator><dc:creator>Adelia, Viona</dc:creator><dc:creator>Alfajri, Rizha</dc:creator><dc:creator>Utari, Rahma Siska</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sukma, Yovika</dc:creator><dc:creator>Azka, Dea Alvionita</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sari, Novita</dc:creator><dc:creator>Putri, Dhea Anisah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fitriani, Nadya</dc:creator><dc:creator>Silvhiany, Sary</dc:creator><dc:creator>Anggeraini, Yentri</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The low performance of Indonesian adults in international assessments such as the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) highlights the need to strengthen teachers’ literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving skills. Addressing this issue requires assessment tasks that are aligned with the PIAAC framework and relevant to educators’ professional contexts. This study provides early evidence on the development of PIAAC-based tasks for teachers, focusing on their validity and readability. A total of 100 tasks covering literacy, numeracy, and problem solving were designed and evaluated through expert validation and readability testing involving teachers. The validation results indicate that the tasks are generally valid, with minor revisions required in answer options, wording clarity, and computational accuracy. Readability findings show that the tasks are well understood by participants, with all evaluated aspects categorized as very good. These results provide initial empirical evidence that PIAAC-based tasks are both valid and readable for use with teachers. As a proof-of-concept, this study suggests the potential of such tasks to support the development of core competencies among educators. Further studies involving large-scale implementation, including computer-based testing environments, are needed to examine their effectiveness in practice.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-05-02</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v17i2.pp383-392</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.v17i2.pp383-392</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 17 No 2 (2026); 383-392</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>https://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/download/4104/411</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>