Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

WHICH IS MORE EFFECTIVE, A MIND MAP OR A CONCEPT MAP LEARNING STRATEGY?

Cakrawala Pendidikan · Vol. 40 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 520–531

DOI
10.21831/cp.v40i2.33031
ISSN
2442-8620, 0216-1370
Terbit
2021-06-17
Penerbit
LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

A mind map and a concept map learning strategy are two learning strategies that are often used to improve students' learning achievement. This study aimed to describe the differences in learning achievement between students who studied with a mind map learning strategy and those who used the concept map learning strategy, as well as the students' responses toward the learning strategy applied. This type of study was a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest control group design. The methods used in this study were a test and a questionnaire. Data of students' learning achievement were analyzed using inferential statistics of covariance analysis, while data of students' responses were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The results of the study indicated that there were significant differences in the learning achievement between students who used the mind map learning strategy and those who studied with the concept map learning strategy. Those who used the mind map learning strategy had better achievements than those using the concept map learning strategy. In addition, the students' responses were more positive toward the mind map learning strategy than to the concept map learning strategy.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 101 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 25 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Yıldız Technical University
  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • State University of Jakarta
  • National Taiwan Normal University
  • State University of Semarang
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Andi SuhandiIndonesia University of Education5
Nuzulira Janeusse FratiwiIndonesia University of Education3
Agus SetiawanIndonesia University of Education2
B. CostuYıldız Technical University2
Ida Bagus Nyoman SudriaUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha2
Lilik HasanahIndonesia University of Education2
Winny LiliawatiIndonesia University of Education2
Duden SaepuzamanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Judhistira Aria UtamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bayram CostuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nur KholifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad NurtantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ida KaniawatiIndonesia University of Education2
Endi SuhendiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ari WidodoIndonesia University of Education2
Putu SudiraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
WahyudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yusri KaminUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Eka MurdaniIndonesia University of Education1
M. MuslimIndonesia University of Education1
Irwanto IrwantoState University of Jakarta1
Bevo WahonoNational Taiwan Normal University1
I Wayan SujaUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
I Nyoman SuardanaUniversitas Pendidikan Ganesha1
Sri HaryaniState University of Semarang1
I. HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
L. M. MertaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohd Zaidi Bin AmiruddinIndonesia University of Education1
Nila ApriliyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bayram ÇoştuYıldız Technical University1
Erwina OktaviantyTanjungpura University1
Almas SafanahIndonesia University of Education1
Lina AviyantiIndonesia University of Education1
Tika NurmalatikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ilham Novian PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bagus Dwi CahynoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">WHICH IS MORE EFFECTIVE, A MIND MAP OR A CONCEPT MAP LEARNING STRATEGY?</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Redhana, I Wayan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widiastari, Kadek</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Samsudin, Achmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Irwanto, Irwanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">concept maps</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">learning achievement</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">learning strategy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">mind maps.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">A mind map and a concept map learning strategy are two learning strategies that are often used to improve students' learning achievement. This study aimed to describe the differences in learning achievement between students who studied with a mind map learning strategy and those who used the concept map learning strategy, as well as the students' responses toward the learning strategy applied. This type of study was a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest control group design. The methods used in this study were a test and a questionnaire. Data of students' learning achievement were analyzed using inferential statistics of covariance analysis, while data of students' responses were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The results of the study indicated that there were significant differences in the learning achievement between students who used the mind map learning strategy and those who studied with the concept map learning strategy. Those who used the mind map learning strategy had better achievements than those using the concept map learning strategy. In addition, the students' responses were more positive toward the mind map learning strategy than to the concept map learning strategy.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-06-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/33031</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21831/cp.v40i2.33031</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan; Vol. 40 No. 2 (2021): Cakrawala Pendidikan (June 2021); 520-531</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-8620</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0216-1370</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/33031/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>