Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 4

EFL Students' Preference on Seating Arrangement in Speaking Class

Al Lughawiyaat · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)

DOI
10.31332/alg.v2i1.2919
ISSN
2746-6035
Published
2022-03-20
Publisher
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

Abstract

This study aims to identify students' choice for seating arrangement in speaking class.The researcher uses qualitative design. As a result this study focuses on students’ preference on seating arrangement in speaking class. The researcher conducted a case study involving 19 participants of the third semester at the English Education Study Program in IAIN Kendari and gathered data from observation, students’ reflection and questionnaire.The finding show that 72% buzz group seating, 10% horseshoe seating, 5% traditional seating, 5% pair seating, and 8% cluster seating. This study implies that seating arrangement help the students’ focus and interest in learning process, participating and engaged in cooperative learning. Therefore, improve their language skills to interact with each other in a more fluent way. Keywords: Seating arrangement, Speaking Class

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 116 co-authorship links · 39 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
  • Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Monash University
  • State University of Semarang
  • National Dong Hwa University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Suhartini SyukriInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari6
Dewi AtikahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari4
Riski RiskiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari3
Azwar AbidinInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari3
Hadi MachmudInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari2
Sarjaniah ZurInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari2
Faridawati FaridawatiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kendari2
La Ode MusaldinMonash University2
Isna HumaeraInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Muthiah HidayatunState University of Semarang1
Muragmi GazalyInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Nur AlimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Fadlansyah FadlansyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Jumarddin La FuaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Mirdan Ali Sabdillah MansirInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Nur Hasanah SafeiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Abdul HalimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Siti AlawiyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Analiza B. TanghalNueva Ecija University of Science and Technology1
Vitra Silvia NingsihUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kendari1
Nurul AnggrainiIndonesia University of Education1
Sri SetyariniIndonesia University of Education1
Sri MaulianiAffiliation unknown1
Yuliyanah SainUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kendari1
Ulfah KhairunnisaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
MaulinaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kendari1
Titin RahmiatinNational Dong Hwa University1
Abdul HalimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Arnie C OsabelNueva Ecija University of Science and Technology1
Mark Ren D. VillaflorNueva Ecija University of Science and Technology1
Abdul HalimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Hildayanti HildayantiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Sukiawati SukiawatiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Aulia RamadhaniInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Sartina MalakaAffiliation unknown1
Abdul HalimAffiliation unknown1
Ilfan Askul PehalaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Lumiati LumiatiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2746-6035/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>EFL Students' Preference on Seating Arrangement in Speaking Class</dc:title><dc:creator>Jannah, Raodahtul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nurfaidah, Sitti</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This study aims to identify students' choice for seating arrangement in speaking class.The researcher uses qualitative design. As a result this study focuses on students’ preference on seating arrangement in speaking class. The researcher conducted a case study involving 19 participants of the third semester at the English Education Study Program in IAIN Kendari and gathered data from observation, students’ reflection and questionnaire.The finding show that 72% buzz group seating, 10% horseshoe seating, 5% traditional seating, 5% pair seating, and 8% cluster seating. This study implies that seating arrangement help the students’ focus and interest in learning process, participating and engaged in cooperative learning. Therefore, improve their language skills to interact with each other in a more fluent way. Keywords: Seating arrangement, Speaking Class&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2022-03-20</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.31332/alg.v2i1.2919</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.31332/alg.v2i1.2919</dc:identifier><dc:source>AL LUGHAWIYAAT; Vol 2 No 1 (2022)</dc:source><dc:source>2746-6035</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/allughawiyaat/article/viewFile/2919/1780</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc>