Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Evaluating Generic Structure and Language Features of Students’ Recount Texts

English Education Journal · Vol. 14 No. 3 (2024) · hlm. 405–415

DOI
10.15294/vqnbjx02
Terbit
2024-09-15
Penerbit
English Education Journal
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study analyzes and assesses recount texts written by students, by focusing on the language features and language structures. This analysis is aimed at fostering student’s writing abilities and communication in their personal experience. The study evaluates the generic structure starting from reorientation, events, and reorientation. The language features are evaluated based on content, syntax, and vocabulary. The data of recount texts were taken from students of SMP Negeri 1 Ketanggungan Brebes, particularly class 8A which consists of 33 students, by conducting a purposive sampling technique. The generic structure of recount texts was analyzed using a scoring rubric adapted from Gerot and Wignell (1994). Meanwhile, a content-based analysis model adapted from Brown and Lee (2015) was employed to evaluate the quality of language features, especially content, syntax, and vocabulary. The quality of students’ recount texts is categorized as excellent, good, adequate, and inadequate. The result showed that 46% of students performed excellent level in orientation and 43% of students performed good level in sequence events. However, 12% of students showed an inadequate level of reorientation. It means that students have a good ability to compile the context and background of their recounts. However, some students have difficulty in concluding their recount. The quality of the language features showed that students presented the main idea and related ideas thoroughly but still needed to improve their vocabulary. The analysis results can be a reference for students to self-evaluate their writing, especially recount texts, and improve the quality. Also, it encourages teachers to apply appropriate teaching strategies in writing classrooms, which meet students’ needs.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 154 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui13
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Alief Noor FaridaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti NurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Saeful BahriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
YuliatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
lidiana astutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Herwindha MahananiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Angga Pratama Armadi PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maria Kartika Primaquinna SejatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Awanda Bramantika SaqifantyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pasca KalisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali MasyharAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Heru SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dolendra PaudelAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Katharina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Evaluating Generic Structure and Language Features of Students’ Recount Texts</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sulistianti, Lilis</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en"> Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sakhiyya , Zulfa </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Recount Texts</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Language Features </dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Generic Structure</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study analyzes and assesses recount texts written by students, by focusing on the language features and language structures. This analysis is aimed at fostering student’s writing abilities and communication in their personal experience. The study evaluates the generic structure starting from reorientation, events, and reorientation. The language features are evaluated based on content, syntax, and vocabulary. The data of recount texts were taken from students of SMP Negeri 1 Ketanggungan Brebes, particularly class 8A which consists of 33 students, by conducting a purposive sampling technique. The generic structure of recount texts was analyzed using a scoring rubric adapted from Gerot and Wignell (1994). Meanwhile, a content-based analysis model adapted from Brown and Lee (2015) was employed to evaluate the quality of language features, especially content, syntax, and vocabulary. The quality of students’ recount texts is categorized as excellent, good, adequate, and inadequate. The result showed that 46% of students performed excellent level in orientation and 43% of students performed good level in sequence events. However, 12% of students showed an inadequate level of reorientation. It means that students have a good ability to compile the context and background of their recounts. However, some students have difficulty in concluding their recount. The quality of the language features showed that students presented the main idea and related ideas thoroughly but still needed to improve their vocabulary. The analysis results can be a reference for students to self-evaluate their writing, especially recount texts, and improve the quality. Also, it encourages teachers to apply appropriate teaching strategies in writing classrooms, which meet students’ needs.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">English Education Journal</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/article/view/10393</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/vqnbjx02</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">English Education Journal; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2024): September 2024; 405-415</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/article/view/10393/2362</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>