Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

TEACHER’S AND STUDENT’S PERCEPTIONS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN TEACHING SPEAKING

English Education Journal · Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016)

ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2016-03-23
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The purposes of this study were to find out the types of the spoken errors commonly made by the students in speaking, knowing the reasons do the students make same errors, describing how English teachers use corrective feedback to refine students’ errors, exploring the types of corrective feedback do the students mostly like, explaining the teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards corrective feedback.The types of this study was descriptive qualitative study. The findings indicated that errors mostly made by the students were pronunciation error, grammatical error and lexical error, why did they make same errors because the students got fossilization, corrcetive feedbacks were used to refine students speaking were explicit correction, repetition and reformulation, corrective feedbacks that the students mostly like were explicit correction, repetition and pronunciation, the teachers perceptions towards corrective feedback were corrective feedback was to know the lacks of the students speaking, the teachers could give the students feedbacks in order not to be fossilized. by giving feedback appropraitely it was believed the students would not be fossilized. The students’ perceptionson corrective feedback were they had very good responses about corrective feedback that were given by the teachers in the classroom.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 124 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang PurwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nyayu Yayu SuryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nesia OktaniaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Novi Rahmania AquarizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuliana YulianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka FatmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
wilis nurlelaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andini Lusiana SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widya AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Hamidah Ary RuchanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endah PurwantiUniversitas Airlangga1
Kathrina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul Malik Al HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syarifa ManullangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rochyani LestiyanawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul MuhibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Anggani L.B.Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Rofi’iAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atikah WatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">TEACHER’S AND STUDENT’S PERCEPTIONS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN TEACHING SPEAKING</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Khunaivi, Herman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartono, Rudi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purposes of this study were to find out the types of the spoken errors commonly made by the students in speaking, knowing the reasons do the students make same errors, describing how English teachers use corrective feedback to refine students’ errors, exploring the types of corrective feedback do the students mostly like, explaining the teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards corrective feedback.The types of this study was descriptive qualitative study. The findings indicated that errors mostly made by the students were pronunciation error, grammatical error and lexical error, why did they make same errors because the students got fossilization, corrcetive feedbacks were used to refine students speaking were explicit correction, repetition and reformulation, corrective feedbacks that the students mostly like were explicit correction, repetition and pronunciation, the teachers perceptions towards corrective feedback were corrective feedback was to know the lacks of the students speaking, the teachers could give the students feedbacks in order not to be fossilized. by giving feedback appropraitely it was believed the students would not be fossilized. The students’ perceptionson corrective feedback were they had very good responses about corrective feedback that were given by the teachers in the classroom.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2016-03-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/9799</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 5 No 2 (2015)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/9799/6263</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>