Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY LEARNERS WITH DIFFERENT SPEAKING PERFORMANCE FOR DEVELOPING SPEAKING ABILITY

English Education Journal · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2017) · hlm. 87–100

ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2017-02-26
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study describes learning strategies used by English language learners with different speaking performance. The aims of this study were (1) describing learning strategies used by learners with high and low speaking performance in improving their speaking abilities, (2) describingthe difference of learning strategies used by learners with high and low speaking performance, (3) Describing factors are influencing the use of learning strategies by learners, (4) Describing problems encountered by learners with low speaking.This study was a qualitative case study on 20 learners of speaking classes. Those learners were taken from two classes at two English courses. The data were collected by using classroom observations, questionnaires, interviews, and the data of learners’ achievement given by teachers. Those were analyzed in descriptive qualitative method.The finding reveals five results: (1) Learners wih high speaking performance used all kinds of strategies in learning speaking. They employed those stretegies in the aqual degree of frequency. (2) Learners with low speaking performance usually used cognitive, metacogntitive and social strategies. They also did not apply those strategies in aqual degree of frequency. (3) Learners with high speaking performance used strategies more dominantly and actively than those with low speaking performers. (4) Learners with high speaking performance seemed to have higher motivation than low speaking performance. This case influences the application of those strategies. (5) Problems encountered by learners with low speaking performance were in the application of strategies. The lowest percentages of variance were explained by memory, compensatory, and affective strategies.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 76 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Katharina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah NurhidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lilis SulistiantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atika PurwaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mar’atul JannahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alim SukrisnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali MufizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Made SuwartamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tyas OktavianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wanda GiovaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurma AiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indrawati .Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Puspa Merah RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fathiya Putri HandiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sulasmianti SamirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur AsriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Etika Noor SusiantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sari RamadhaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suci RamadhaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Billy Ardy DwiwiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sedhah Widuri ArientariniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rinasa Intan CitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SRI WAHYUNIHasanuddin University1
Wahyu MegawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nadya ChorunissaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY LEARNERS WITH DIFFERENT SPEAKING PERFORMANCE FOR DEVELOPING SPEAKING ABILITY</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Karomi Safari, M. Ubaidillah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study describes learning strategies used by English language learners with different speaking performance. The aims of this study were (1) describing learning strategies used by learners with high and low speaking performance in improving their speaking abilities, (2) describingthe difference of learning strategies used by learners with high and low speaking performance, (3) Describing factors are influencing the use of learning strategies by learners, (4) Describing problems encountered by learners with low speaking.This study was a qualitative case study on 20 learners of speaking classes. Those learners were taken from two classes at two English courses. The data were collected by using classroom observations, questionnaires, interviews, and the data of learners’ achievement given by teachers. Those were analyzed in descriptive qualitative method.The finding reveals five results: (1) Learners wih high speaking performance used all kinds of strategies in learning speaking. They employed those stretegies in the aqual degree of frequency. (2) Learners with low speaking performance usually used cognitive, metacogntitive and social strategies. They also did not apply those strategies in aqual degree of frequency. (3) Learners with high speaking performance used strategies more dominantly and actively than those with low speaking performers. (4) Learners with high speaking performance seemed to have higher motivation than low speaking performance. This case influences the application of those strategies. (5) Problems encountered by learners with low speaking performance were in the application of strategies. The lowest percentages of variance were explained by memory, compensatory, and affective strategies.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-02-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/13060</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 6 No 2 (2016); 87-100</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/13060/7148</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>