Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

PATTERNS OF INTERACTION IN PEER FEEDBACK PROVISION TO THE STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY WRITINGS

English Education Journal · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017) · hlm. 06–11

ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2017-05-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study investigated students’ nature in pair interaction due to its vital role in learning. Therefore this study was aimed to describe and to explain patterns of interaction in peer feedback, the aspects of writing the students were concerned within peer feedback, influences of pair interactions to the students’ writings, and the students’ perceptions and attitudes on peer feedback. This study mostly employed qualitative approach and a case study method. The result showed that five patterns emerged in pair interaction i.e. collaborative pairs, dominant/dominant pair, dominant/passive pairs, expert/novice pairs, and passive/passive pair. However, feedback provided by collaborative and expert learners contributed to the revision changes of their partner’s writings so that the development of writing aspects under these two patterns was better. Besides, other factors which contributed to the students’ writings were confounding variables such as student’s proficiency, writing capability, and teacher feedback. Thus these results endorsed the former studies e.g. Storch’s (2002b) study, Iris’ (2014) study, and Roberson’s (2014) study. Another result was that whole students had good perceptions and good attitudes on peer feedback provision. However, the bottom line of this study was that collaborative pairs and expert/novice pairs had better second writings.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 113 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti NurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Saeful BahriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Katharina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah NurhidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lilis SulistiantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atika PurwaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mar’atul JannahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Samsudin SamsudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Ubaidillah Karomi SafariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Made SuwartamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tyas OktavianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ummul IzzahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wanda GiovaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Inayatul MaulaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
yulia shinta kusumaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurma AiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rifqi Hazmi MamduhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PATTERNS OF INTERACTION IN PEER FEEDBACK PROVISION TO THE STUDENTS’ EXPOSITORY WRITINGS</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Mufiz, Ali</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sukrisno, Alim</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This&amp;nbsp; study&amp;nbsp; investigated&amp;nbsp; students’&amp;nbsp; nature&amp;nbsp; in&amp;nbsp; pair&amp;nbsp; interaction&amp;nbsp; due&amp;nbsp; to&amp;nbsp; its&amp;nbsp; vital&amp;nbsp; role&amp;nbsp; in&amp;nbsp; learning. Therefore this study was aimed to describe and to explain patterns of interaction in peer feedback, the aspects of writing the students were concerned within peer feedback, influences of pair interactions to the students’ writings, and the students’ perceptions and attitudes on peer feedback. This study mostly employed qualitative approach and a case study method. The result showed that five patterns emerged in pair interaction i.e. collaborative pairs, dominant/dominant pair, dominant/passive&amp;nbsp; pairs,&amp;nbsp; expert/novice&amp;nbsp; pairs,&amp;nbsp; and&amp;nbsp; passive/passive&amp;nbsp; pair.&amp;nbsp; However,&amp;nbsp; feedback provided by collaborative and expert learners contributed to the revision changes of their partner’s writings so that the development of writing aspects under these two patterns was better. Besides, other&amp;nbsp; factors which&amp;nbsp; contributed to the&amp;nbsp; students’&amp;nbsp; writings&amp;nbsp; were&amp;nbsp; confounding&amp;nbsp; variables such as student’s proficiency, writing capability, and teacher feedback. Thus these results endorsed the former studies e.g. Storch’s (2002b) study, Iris’ (2014) study, and Roberson’s (2014) study. Another result&amp;nbsp; was&amp;nbsp; that&amp;nbsp; whole&amp;nbsp; students&amp;nbsp; had&amp;nbsp; good&amp;nbsp; perceptions&amp;nbsp; and&amp;nbsp; good&amp;nbsp; attitudes&amp;nbsp; on&amp;nbsp; peer&amp;nbsp; feedback provision. However, the bottom line of this study was that collaborative pairs and expert/novice pairs had better second writings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-05-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/14640</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 7 No 1 (2017); 06-11</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/14640/7977</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>