Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Effectiveness of Roundtable and One Stay Two Strays Techniques to Teach Speaking Skill to Students with High and Low Self-Confidence

English Education Journal · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2018) · hlm. 130–137

DOI
10.15294/eej.v8i3.21350
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2018-02-07
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The aim of this current research is to investigate how effective was One Stay Two Stray technique to teach speaking to students with high and low self-confidence, how effective was the Roundtable technique to teach speaking to students with high and low self-confidence, how effective was the One Stay Two Stray technique compared with Roundtable technique to teach speaking to students with high self-confidence, how effective was the One Stay Two Stray technique compared with Roundtable technique to teach speaking to students with low self-confidence and how significant was the interaction among technique in teaching speaking skills and students’ self-confidence. The research design was a quasi experimental design with 2x2 factorial design conducted in SMA N 1 Jekulo Kudus. There were two experimental groups involved. The students’ different self-confidence to be a factor that influence the techniques. Three instruments used in this research, namely: Observation checklist, questionnaire, and oral test. The data was analysed using ANOVA to answer the hypothesizes. The research findings indicated that Roundtable were more effective than One Stay Two Stray for teaching student with high and low self-confidence. Based on the analysis of ANOVA there were no significant among techniques and self-confidence. It was proven by the value of the Sig in the table of analysis. In general, the techniques were effective to teach speaking skills without self-confidence.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 107 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Veny Nur AiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Daniela Elivas HastunarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daning Desy ArtyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atikah WatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anita Rizky KurniawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Windhariyati Dyah KusumawantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
abdulhakim faraj alowalidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Issy YuliasryAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Rizky RochmawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Oscar Yustino CarascalaoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur AnisahUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Mochamad Adnan FalahuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Alimul KhakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti Aniqoh ShofwaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dewi FatichaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rangga PermanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kurnia AtiullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widya YulianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti Nafakhati RahmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Umi Aisyah Sulistyaning TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dessi Fajarika NuninsariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Weksa Fradita AsriyamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syarifah SyarifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Istiqomah Khoirul IlmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Junnilalita Aisya VirginAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hikmah FujiatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effectiveness of Roundtable and One Stay Two Strays Techniques to Teach Speaking Skill to Students with High and Low Self-Confidence</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Farista, Nova Rifqi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Anggani Linggar Bharati, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wuli Fitriati, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">



The aim of this current research is to investigate how effective was One Stay Two Stray technique to teach speaking to students with high and low self-confidence, how effective was the Roundtable technique to teach speaking to students with high and low self-confidence, how effective was the One Stay Two Stray technique compared with Roundtable technique to teach speaking to students with high self-confidence, how effective was the One Stay Two Stray technique compared with Roundtable technique to teach speaking to students with low self-confidence and how significant was the interaction among technique in teaching speaking skills and students’ self-confidence. The research design was a quasi experimental design with 2x2 factorial design conducted in SMA N 1 Jekulo Kudus. There were two experimental groups involved. The students’ different self-confidence to be a factor that influence the techniques. Three instruments used in this research, namely: Observation checklist, questionnaire, and oral test. The data was analysed using ANOVA to answer the hypothesizes. The research findings indicated that Roundtable were more effective than One Stay Two Stray for teaching student with high and low self-confidence. Based on the analysis of ANOVA there were no significant among techniques and self-confidence. It was proven by the value of the Sig in the table of analysis. In general, the techniques were effective to teach speaking skills without self-confidence.



</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-02-07</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/21350</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v8i3.21350</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 8 No 2 (2018): June 2018; 130-137</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v8i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/21350/10074</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>