Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Grammatical Equivalence of English-Indonesian Translation of Compound-Complex Sentences in Iadc Workover Completion Manual

English Education Journal · Vol. 8 No. 3 (2018) · hlm. 279–289

DOI
10.15294/eej.v8i3.24144
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2018-07-26
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

During the translation of IADC Workover Completion Manual, especially the compound-complex sentences, grammatical equivalence is crucial in order to produce accurate, acceptable, and readable translations. Therefore, this study is conducted to evaluate the realization of grammatical equivalence in English–Indonesian translation of compound-complex sentences in the manual and its relation to the translation quality. This study is a descriptive qualitative study. The researcher used document to collect the data of the compound-complex sentences. Besides, questionnaire and interview were completed by the target readers and the expert readers to assess the translation quality. The findings presents that out of 106 English compound-complex sentences that are translated to Indonesian, 74 (69.8%) of them are grammatically equivalent and 32 (30.1%) of them are not grammatically equivalent. It means that the 74 sentence translations’ structures are equivalent. In addition, the translations are literal and there are no shifts. In contrast, 32 non-grammatical equivalent translations are due to their free translations and lead to the translation shifts. From the findings, it can also be concluded that the grammatical equivalence influences the accuracy, the acceptability, and the readability of the translations for the target readers. On the other hand, for the expert readers, the grammatical equivalence only affects readability.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 112 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Moh. Ilhami HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi AngganiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daniela Elivas HastunarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bambang Ruby SugiartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendro KuncoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Ari SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agnes Arum BudianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ernidawati ErnidawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Miftakhul UlumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nanda LahitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanhan LovihandrieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Latifa Ika SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kurnia Ari SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Adib LutfiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Musmuliadi MusmuliadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Inayatul MaulaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Isti KristianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rifqi Hazmi MamduhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Destra Wibowo KusumoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aris NoviAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad Yusron AuladiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ranti Harvi RahimiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hesti Eka WardaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Grammatical Equivalence of English-Indonesian Translation of Compound-Complex Sentences in Iadc Workover Completion Manual</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Oktaviani, Santi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sutopo, Djoko</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">During the translation of IADC Workover Completion Manual, especially the compound-complex sentences, grammatical equivalence is crucial in order to produce accurate, acceptable, and readable translations. Therefore, this study is conducted to evaluate the realization of grammatical equivalence in English–Indonesian translation of compound-complex sentences in the manual and its relation to the translation quality. This study is a descriptive qualitative study. The researcher used document to collect the data of the compound-complex sentences. Besides, questionnaire and interview were completed by the target readers and the expert readers to assess the translation quality. The findings presents that out of 106 English compound-complex sentences that are translated to Indonesian, 74 (69.8%) of them are grammatically equivalent and 32 (30.1%) of them are not grammatically equivalent. It means that the 74 sentence translations’ structures are equivalent. In addition, the translations are literal and there are no shifts. In contrast, 32 non-grammatical equivalent translations are due to their free translations and lead to the translation shifts. From the findings, it can also be concluded that the grammatical equivalence influences the accuracy, the acceptability, and the readability of the translations for the target readers. On the other hand, for the expert readers, the grammatical equivalence only affects readability.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-07-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/24144</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v8i3.24144</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 8 No 3 (2018): September 2018; 279-289</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v8i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/24144/11111</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>