Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Students’ Gambits and Debate Structure in National University Debating Championship (NUDC) 2018 of West Java

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018) · hlm. 1–10

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i1.26663
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2018-10-24
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aimed to explain the appropriateness of using gambits in students’ debate competition, the debate structure realized in the students’ debate competition, the contribution of gambits to the students’ debate structure, and the ways the students overcome the difficulties of using gambits in the debate competition. To achieve the aims, this study used discourse analysis as the research design. To collect the data, this study used video recorder in observation and interview as the instrument. This study applied Keller and Warner (1988)’s theory about conversation gambits and Harvey-Smith (2011)’s theory about debate structure to analyze the data. The subjects in this study were 40 undergraduate students (20 teams) from different universities participating in National University Debating Championship (NUDC) 2018 of West Java. Their debate competition (five exhibitions) were observed, transcribed and analyzed. The objects of the study were the students’ gambits and debate structure. The findings from observation showed that most of debaters used variety of gambits from opening, linking and responding gambits to deliver their speech appropriately. Most of debaters applied the debate structure in the debate competition. Only one or two debater/s did not apply some parts of the debate structure. The use of gambits gave high contribution to the students’ debate structure to support them in making introduction, rebuttals, arguments, and conclusion in their debate speech. The results of interview showed that most of students learned gambits naturally and to overcome the difficulties of using gambits in any situation was by learning and practicing hard to make the speech perfect.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 139 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Alief Noor FaridaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti NurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Saeful BahriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh. Akhdan Aufarizal IrhamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Zaid MuttaqinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pasca KalisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Katharina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Indah NurhidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Putri AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisa Nur AtikahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lilis SulistiantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SetiowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdrurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mokhammad Pradana AjiasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Students’ Gambits and Debate Structure in National University Debating Championship (NUDC) 2018 of West Java</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Permatasari Gunawan, Yayang Gita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yuliasri, Issy</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aimed to explain the appropriateness of using gambits in students’ debate competition, the debate structure realized in the students’ debate competition, the contribution of gambits to the students’ debate structure, and the ways the students overcome the difficulties of using gambits in the debate competition. To achieve the aims, this study used discourse analysis as the research design. To collect the data, this study used video recorder in observation and interview as the instrument. This study applied Keller and Warner (1988)’s theory about conversation gambits and Harvey-Smith (2011)’s theory about debate structure to analyze the data. The subjects in this study were 40 undergraduate students (20 teams) from different universities participating in National University Debating Championship (NUDC) 2018 of West Java. Their debate competition (five exhibitions) were observed, transcribed and analyzed. The objects of the study were the students’ gambits and debate structure. The findings from observation showed that most of debaters used variety of gambits from opening, linking and responding gambits to deliver their speech appropriately. Most of debaters applied the debate structure in the debate competition. Only one or two debater/s did not apply some parts of the debate structure. The use of gambits gave high contribution to the students’ debate structure to support them in making introduction, rebuttals, arguments, and conclusion in their debate speech. The results of interview showed that most of students learned gambits naturally and to overcome the difficulties of using gambits in any situation was by learning and practicing hard to make the speech perfect.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-10-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/26663</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i1.26663</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 1 (2019): March 2019; 1-10</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/26663/11721</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>