Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Realization of Actional and Formulaic Competence in Teachers’ Talk in English Language Class

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018) · hlm. 41–55

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i1.26861
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2018-11-26
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

A number of studies have investigated the phenomenon of teachers’ talk to explain its role in the process of acquiring a target language in a classroom setting. However, studies of teachers’ talk in the field of communicative competence and it sub-competence have not much done yet. Three English teachers at SMAN 1 Semarang, SMA Nasional Karangturi Semarang, and SMA Mardisiswa Semarang were involved in this spoken discourse study to explain the realization of actional competence which proposed by Celce_Murcia et al. (1995) and formulaic competence based on the Biber et al’s. (2004) theory in teachers’ talk. Furthermore, this study also explained the relationship between those competencies. The findings of this study revealed that English teachers mostly performed actional competence in five sub-categories namely asking questions, giving instructions, explaining, reacting to interlocutors’ speech, and complementing. Related to the realization of lexical bundles, teachers’ talk mainly contained verb phrase along with dependent clauses. In contrast, lexical bundles that incorporate noun phrase and preposition fragments accounted for only a small proportion of lexical bundles. Dealing with the relationship between both competences, it revealed that there is a stock of lexical bundles on each language function. Seeing there is a relationship between both competences, the teachers must choose appropriate utterances in a given situation as the model for the students. The teachers need to maintain a balance, they are not only focused on grammar and pronunciation, but also have adequate knowledge and competence of lexical bundles for performing appropriate language functions.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 114 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti NurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Saeful BahriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Katharina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Indah NurhidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lilis SulistiantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atika PurwaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mar’atul JannahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Ubaidillah Karomi SafariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alim SukrisnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali MufizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Made SuwartamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tyas OktavianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wanda GiovaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Inayatul MaulaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
yulia shinta kusumaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurma AiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rifqi Hazmi MamduhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yayang Gita Permatasari GunawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Realization of Actional and Formulaic Competence in Teachers’ Talk in English Language Class</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Colle, Andi Tenry Lawangen Aspat</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">A number of studies have investigated the phenomenon of teachers’ talk to explain its role in the process of acquiring a target language in a classroom setting. However, studies of teachers’ talk in the field of communicative competence and it sub-competence have not much done yet. Three English teachers at SMAN 1 Semarang, SMA Nasional Karangturi Semarang, and SMA Mardisiswa Semarang were involved in this spoken discourse study to explain the realization of actional competence which proposed by Celce_Murcia et al. (1995) and formulaic competence based on the Biber et al’s. (2004) theory in teachers’ talk. Furthermore, this study also explained the relationship between those competencies. The findings of this study revealed that English teachers mostly performed actional competence in five sub-categories namely asking questions, giving instructions, explaining, reacting to interlocutors’ speech, and complementing.&amp;nbsp; Related to the realization of lexical bundles, teachers’ talk mainly contained verb phrase along with dependent clauses. In contrast, lexical bundles that incorporate noun phrase and preposition fragments accounted for only a small proportion of lexical bundles. Dealing with the relationship between both competences, it revealed that there is a stock of lexical bundles on each language function. Seeing there is a relationship between both competences, the teachers must choose appropriate utterances in a given situation as the model for the students. The teachers need to maintain a balance, they are not only focused on grammar and pronunciation, but also have adequate knowledge and competence of lexical bundles for performing appropriate language functions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-11-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/26861</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i1.26861</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 1 (2019): March 2019; 41-55</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/26861/11975</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>