Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Realization of Transitivity Systems in Undergraduate Learners’ Argumentative Essay Texts

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 4 (2019) · hlm. 450–458

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i4.31677
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2019-07-29
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Transitivity systems define as a system to explore how language concernes in the overall grammatical resources for construing going on. The ability to realize transitivity systems in argumentative essays is important because by realizing these systems, the writer can explore language in process of doing, sensing, saying activities happened in the real world. Therefore, this study aims to explore the realization of transitivity systems in students’ argumentative essay texts. There are five argumentative essays written by students who have a good quality in writing skill. The findings show that the writers have already realized six process types corresponding with participants and circumstances. By realizing all process types in essay, the readers can experience different world so that they will know the writers’ experience in using language to mark experiential meaning in essays. In this case, the writers mostly asked readers to experience with process of doing by material process. Thus, the writers moved the readers’ attention by showing the experience of stating relation of the participants. The relation was showed in a configuration of being in attributing and identifying the participants. Therefore, the occurrence of other processes as well as participants and circumstances makes the argumentative essay text more alive. Keywords: Transitivity Systems, Process types, Participants, Circumstances, argumentative essays.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 135 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui14
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Irawaty IrawatyUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Rini FidiyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Eko MukmintoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Holy Latifah HanumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Fery AnitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Edward Michael SimangunsongAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hafidz DaffaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Samuel Adi NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh. Ilhami HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi AngganiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daniela Elivas HastunarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bambang Ruby SugiartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendro KuncoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Ari SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agnes Arum BudianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ernidawati ErnidawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Miftakhul UlumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nanda LahitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanhan LovihandrieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Latifa Ika SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kurnia Ari SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Realization of Transitivity Systems in Undergraduate Learners’ Argumentative Essay Texts</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nurkholidah, Endang Siti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sutopo, Djoko</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widhiyanto, Widhiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Transitivity systems define as a system to explore how language concernes in the overall grammatical resources for construing going on. The ability to realize transitivity systems in argumentative essays is important because by realizing these systems, the writer can explore language in process of doing, sensing, saying activities happened in the real world. Therefore, this study aims to explore the realization of transitivity systems in students’ argumentative essay texts. There are five argumentative essays written by students who have a good quality in writing skill. The findings show that the writers have already realized six process types corresponding with participants and circumstances. By realizing all process types in essay, the readers can experience different world so that they will know the writers’ experience in using language to mark experiential meaning in essays. In this case, the writers mostly asked readers to experience with process of doing by material process. Thus, the writers moved the readers’ attention by showing the experience of stating relation of the participants. The relation was showed in a configuration of being in attributing and identifying the participants. Therefore, the occurrence of other processes as well as participants and circumstances makes the argumentative essay text more alive.
Keywords: Transitivity Systems, Process types, Participants, Circumstances, argumentative essays.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/31677</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i4.31677</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 4 (2019): December 2019; 450-458</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/31677/13777</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>