Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Realization of Brown - Levinson’s Politeness Strategies in the Movie “The Proposal”

English Education Journal · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 274–288

DOI
10.15294/eej.v11i1.43818
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2021-06-20
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Communication is a main part in a society. In every society, there are some styles and ways of using language. There are two kinds of communication, verbal and non-verbal communication. Non-verbal communication can be gesture or expression. The purpose of this study was to analyze the positive and negative politeness strategies used by the speakers in the conversations of The Proposal movie. Method of data analysis were done by using Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory. The results of this study show some findings. There were positive politeness strategies used in the utterances with the highest data was performed by the the seek agreement sub-strategy - 18,6%; and the lowest was performed by assert or presuppose speaker’s knowledge of and concern for hearer’s wants sub-strategy - 1,2%. In the negative politeness strategy, the highest data was performed by the impersonalize speaker and hearer sub-strategy – 39,3%%; and the lowest was performed by apologize sub-strategy – 1,4%. It can be concluded from the study, the difference between positive and negative strategies is the relationship between the speaker and listener, and the language used in speech.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 124 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang PurwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nyayu Yayu SuryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nesia OktaniaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Novi Rahmania AquarizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuliana YulianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka FatmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
wilis nurlelaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andini Lusiana SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widya AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Hamidah Ary RuchanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endah PurwantiUniversitas Airlangga1
Kathrina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul Malik Al HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syarifa ManullangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rochyani LestiyanawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul MuhibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Anggani L.B.Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Rofi’iAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atikah WatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Realization of Brown - Levinson’s Politeness Strategies in the Movie “The Proposal”</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Azmi, Mia Nurul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartono, Rudi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Communication is a main part in a society. In every society, there are some styles and ways of using language. There are two kinds of communication, verbal and non-verbal communication. Non-verbal communication can be gesture or expression. The purpose of this study was to analyze the positive and negative politeness strategies used by the speakers in the conversations of The Proposal movie. Method of data analysis were done by using Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory. The results of this study show some findings. There were positive politeness strategies used in the utterances with the highest data was performed by the the seek agreement sub-strategy - 18,6%; and the lowest was performed by assert or presuppose speaker’s knowledge of and concern for hearer’s wants sub-strategy - 1,2%. In the negative politeness strategy, the highest data was performed by the impersonalize speaker and hearer sub-strategy – 39,3%%; and the lowest was performed by apologize sub-strategy – 1,4%. It can be concluded from the study, the difference between positive and negative strategies is the relationship between the speaker and listener, and the language used in speech.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/43818</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v11i1.43818</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 11 No 2 (2021): June 2021; 274-288</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v11i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/43818/18167</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>