Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Evaluating the Use of Discourse Markers in Selected English Education Journal Articles

English Education Journal · Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022) · hlm. 1–9

DOI
10.15294/eej.v12i1.52252
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2022-03-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Considering the important roles of discourse markers in writing academic purposes, the researchers evaluate the use of discourse markers in English Education Journal articles. This research aims to find out the types of discourse markers precisely contrastive, elaborative and inferential discourse markers, and the errors in using those expressions. This research uses a qualitative research design with the data from written language especially the journal articles published by English Education Journal (EEJ). Thus, specifically this research employs content analysis. There were twenty journal articles analyzed. They represented their volume especially there are four volumes in 2020. The findings of this research demonstrated that all of the research data applied those types of discourse markers. The type of elaborative discourse markers were the first type used by the writers. It is the frequently used by the writers in the journal articles. In this case, it used in 890 times. The expression frequently used is and. Meanwhile, the errors in using discourse markers in the journal articles occurred in 17 times. Here, the wrong relation category as the commonly applied in 7 times. These findings inform us to improve our awareness in applying those expressions. Thus, it can be concluded that the discourse markers is required in creating journal articles. Therefore, the writers have to concern regarding to the categories of errors in using discourse markers for avoiding inappropriateness.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 136 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Widya AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
Katharina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang PurwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nyayu Yayu SuryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nesia OktaniaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Novi Rahmania AquarizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahma WidiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah NurhidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahmiwati RahmiwatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Januarius MujiiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuliana YulianaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Annisa Nur AtikahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka FatmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahda Alifa FegasantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
wilis nurlelaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi MusthafaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andini Lusiana SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Urfatul MakhsunahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Evaluating the Use of Discourse Markers in Selected English Education Journal Articles</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Raputri, Egi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pratama, Hendi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartono, Rudi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Considering the important roles of discourse markers in writing academic purposes, the researchers evaluate the use of discourse markers in English Education Journal articles. This research aims to find out the types of discourse markers precisely contrastive, elaborative and inferential discourse markers, and the errors in using those expressions. This research uses a qualitative research design with the data from written language especially the journal articles published by English Education Journal (EEJ). Thus, specifically this research employs content analysis. There were twenty journal articles analyzed. They represented their volume especially there are four volumes in 2020. The findings of this research demonstrated that all of the research data applied those types of discourse markers. The type of elaborative discourse markers were the first type used by the writers. It is the frequently used by the writers in the journal articles. In this case, it used in 890 times. The expression frequently used is and. Meanwhile, the errors in using discourse markers in the journal articles occurred in 17 times. Here, the wrong relation category as the commonly applied in 7 times. These findings inform us to improve our awareness in applying those expressions. Thus, it can be concluded that the discourse markers is required in creating journal articles. Therefore, the writers have to concern regarding to the categories of errors in using discourse markers for avoiding inappropriateness.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/52252</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v12i1.52252</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 12 No 1 (2022): March 2022; 1-9</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v12i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/52252/20695</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>