Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Violation of Leech’s Politeness Maxims and Interlocutor’s Responses in Enola Holmes 2020 Movie

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023) · hlm. 191–208

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i2.71435
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2023-06-20
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The present study aimed at investigating the violation of politeness maxims of Leech (2014) and the interlocutor’s responses in the movie of Enola Holmes 2020. This study focuses on discussing violations of decency according to Leech and illocutionary acts where there is an action in acting an utterance and a response to what is done. The source of the data was taken from the utterances or dialogue spoken by the characters in this film, the method used is the documentation method by observing the film and then making a transcript of the conversation according to the required data then watching the video and reading the script repeatedly. A qualitative descriptive research design was used in this study. In line with that, Leech's theory of politeness maxims (2014) and illocutionary acts (1993) were used to analyze the research data. Based on the analysis, it was found 7 types of maxims, namely generosity maxim, tact maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim, obligation O to S maxim, agreement maxim, and sympathy maxim. Then, the interlocutor’s responses also found 4 types in this movie were Competitive, Convivial, Collaborative and Conflictive, the most appears of violation politeness maxim was Collaborative functions (33,3%), while the most least was Convivial functions (5,5%). There were lots of interlocutor’s reactions by the characters of the movie such as angry, smiling, offended, etc.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 103 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Widya AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Katharina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Indah NurhidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahmiwati RahmiwatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Januarius MujiiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisa Nur AtikahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahda Alifa FegasantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi MusthafaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Urfatul MakhsunahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yesi Novita SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syifa Fellashufa FadillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Regita Widya MurtiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Faiz MaulidaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Egi RaputriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yan MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Etri WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Luluatul Musyafa'ahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Etik Khusnul KhotimahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Djanuarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tomy WidiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ayu Dewi FatimahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Heru PriyatnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
umniyyatul makmurohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Zaiim MuhtadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ummi Ashim AzzahraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Violation of Leech’s Politeness Maxims and Interlocutor’s Responses in Enola Holmes 2020 Movie</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Fitriana, Shofi Anis</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pratama, Hendi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The present study aimed at investigating the violation of politeness maxims of Leech (2014) and the interlocutor’s responses in the movie of Enola Holmes 2020. This study focuses on discussing violations of decency according to Leech and illocutionary acts where there is an action in acting an utterance and a response to what is done. The source of the data was taken from the utterances or dialogue spoken by the characters in this film, the method used is the documentation method by observing the film and then making a transcript of the conversation according to the required data then watching the video and reading the script repeatedly. A qualitative descriptive research design was used in this study. In line with that, Leech's theory of politeness maxims (2014) and illocutionary acts (1993) were used to analyze the research data. Based on the analysis, it was found 7 types of maxims, namely generosity maxim, tact maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim, obligation O to S maxim, agreement maxim, and sympathy maxim. Then, the interlocutor’s responses also found 4 types in this movie were Competitive, Convivial, Collaborative and Conflictive, the most appears of violation politeness maxim was Collaborative functions (33,3%), while the most least was Convivial functions (5,5%). There were lots of interlocutor’s reactions by the characters of the movie such as angry, smiling, offended, etc.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/71435</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i2.71435</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 2 (2023): June 2023; 191-208</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/71435/25398</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>