Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

LEARNERS’ ABILITY TO NEGOTIATE MEANING IN INTERACTIONAL CONVERSATION

ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · hlm. 15–23

DOI
10.15294/elt.v7i1.25300
ISSN
2721-4532, 2252-6706
Terbit
2018-08-30
Penerbit
English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Negotiation is one kind of ways in order to interact with other people. Doing negotiation means that participants are able to reveal what they feel and think. For this study, observation was done before recording. Audio recording is the primary data besides there was also note. The note is about the class’ situations that were not included in the recording. Then, the data is transformed into transcription. After the transcript is made, the data is able to be analyzed. Results indicate that the learners mostly negotiate well. They produce statements in compliance with mood elements. They also have various kinds of mood types in the conversation. The ways that the students negotiate meaning in order to get the meaning across are countering the interlocutors’ responds, responding the teacher by giving statement that exactly suit to the teacher’s questions, and having equal turns reciprocally to convey their ideas in a conversation. In order to compensate their language problems, the students use some strategies such using minor clause, speaking in their native language, and doing non-verbal communication. In addition, there are also some grammatical problems hinder the negotiation of meaning. They ellipse a certain element of the clause. Another grammatical problem is that the students do not use fit correspondence between Finite and other elements.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 111 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Moh. Ilhami HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi AngganiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daniela Elivas HastunarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bambang Ruby SugiartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendro KuncoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Ari SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agnes Arum BudianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yaholil MustapaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ernidawati ErnidawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Miftakhul UlumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nanda LahitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanhan LovihandrieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Latifa Ika SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kurnia Ari SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Santi OktavianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Adib LutfiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Musmuliadi MusmuliadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Inayatul MaulaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Isti KristianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rifqi Hazmi MamduhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Destra Wibowo KusumoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aris NoviAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">LEARNERS’ ABILITY TO NEGOTIATE MEANING IN INTERACTIONAL CONVERSATION</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nurazizah, Nuki</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Agustien, Helena I. R.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sutopo, Djoko</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Negotiation is one kind of ways in order to interact with other people. Doing negotiation means that participants are able to reveal what they feel and think. For this study, observation was done before recording. Audio recording is the primary data besides there was also note. The note is about the class’ situations that were not included in the recording. Then, the data is transformed into transcription. After the transcript is made, the data is able to be analyzed. Results indicate that the learners mostly negotiate well. They produce statements in compliance with mood elements. They also have various kinds of mood types in the conversation. The ways that the students negotiate meaning in order to get the meaning across are countering the interlocutors’ responds, responding the teacher by giving statement that exactly suit to the teacher’s questions, and having equal turns reciprocally to convey their ideas in a conversation. In order to compensate their language problems, the students use some strategies such using minor clause, speaking in their native language, and doing non-verbal communication. In addition, there are also some grammatical problems hinder the negotiation of meaning. They ellipse a certain element of the clause. Another grammatical problem is that the students do not use fit correspondence between Finite and other elements.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-08-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/25300</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/elt.v7i1.25300</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; Vol 7 No 1 (2018): ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; 15-23</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-4532</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6706</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/elt.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/25300/11344</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>