Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Developing Assessment Instrument of Data, Technology, and Human Literacy in Physics Learning

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019) · hlm. 155–164

DOI
10.15294/jere.v8i2.38370
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Terbit
2019-08-25
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aims to determine validity of the assessment instrument data, technology, and human literacy in physics learning. The research method uses research and development (RnD) with modified 4-D model until development stage. Instrument of validation was assessed by 6 validators. The instrument was tested by 36 students of class X SMK Texmaco Semarang. The form of instruments is multiple choice test with 21 item to measure the cognitive domain. Data analysis in this research are tests of content validity, reliability, internal consistency, discrimination power, and level of difficulty. The results of the content validity by using Aiken’s coefficient get an average score 0.84 with a valid category at significance level of 0.05. Cronbach’s Alpha and ICC values from reliability test are 0.77 and 0.806 with reliable categories. The results of internal consistency showed that 80.95% items had a good internal consistency. There are 4 items with category not used from the discrimination power test. Furthermore from the results of the difficulty level, 7 items are easy, 13 items are medium, and 1 item is difficult. Based on results of the instrument analysis can be concluded that the instrument developed were valid and reliabel then can be used to measure ability of data, technology, and humans literacy in physics learning.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 159 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 18 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • The University of Queensland
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Muria Kudus University
  • IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang9
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang7
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang7
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang6
Bambang SubaliState University of Semarang6
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang4
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang4
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang3
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang3
. SupriyadiThe University of Queensland3
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sarwi SarwiState University of Semarang3
Bambang SubaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ridho Adi NegoroState University of Semarang3
Budi AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sugianto SugiantoState University of Semarang3
S. SulhadiState University of Semarang2
Fina FakhriyahMuria Kudus University2
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang2
KhumaediState University of Semarang2
Suraji SurajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Roudloh Muna LiaState University of Semarang2
Muhammad KhumaediState University of Semarang2
Supriyadi SupriyadiState University of Semarang2
Sugianto SugiantoIAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon2
Teguh DarsonoState University of Semarang2
Husna ArifahYogyakarta State University2
R SusantiState University of Semarang2
Sugiyanto SugiyantoState University of Semarang2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiState University of Semarang2
Kartono KartonoState University of Semarang2
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Nathan HindartoState University of Semarang2
Langlang HandayaniState University of Semarang2
Budi AstutiState University of Semarang2
Sulhadi SulhadiState University of Semarang2
Rizal Setya PerdanaUniversity of Brawijaya1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Developing Assessment Instrument of Data, Technology, and Human Literacy in Physics Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Dewi, Candra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rusilowati, Ani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fianti, Fianti</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to determine validity of the assessment instrument data, technology, and human literacy in physics learning. The research method uses research and development (RnD) with modified 4-D model until development stage. Instrument of validation was assessed by 6 validators. The instrument was tested by 36 students of class X SMK Texmaco Semarang. The form of instruments is multiple choice test with 21 item to measure the cognitive domain. Data analysis in this research are tests of content validity, reliability, internal consistency, discrimination power, and level of difficulty. The results of the content validity by using Aiken’s coefficient get an average score 0.84 with a valid category at significance level of 0.05. Cronbach’s Alpha and ICC values from reliability test are 0.77 and 0.806 with reliable categories. The results of internal consistency showed that 80.95% items had a good internal consistency. There are 4 items with category not used from the discrimination power test. Furthermore from the results of the difficulty level, 7 items are easy, 13 items are medium, and 1 item is difficult. Based on results of the instrument analysis can be concluded that the instrument developed were valid and reliabel then can be used to measure ability of data, technology, and humans literacy in physics learning.
&amp;nbsp;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-08-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/38370</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jere.v8i2.38370</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 8 No 2 (2019); 155-164</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jere.v8i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/38370/16176</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>