Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Local Wisdom Learning Approach Towards Students Learning Outcomes

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 8 No. 5 (2019) · hlm. 197–205

ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Terbit
2019-07-08
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The purpose of this study was to; analyze the differences between Gusjigang learning approach and conventional learning on student learning outcomes. The type of research used was a quantitative research method with a nonequivalent control group design. The population consisted of all fourth-grade students of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah TBS Kudus Regency. The sample was selected through a purposive sampling technique, so that class IV B was selected with 23 students as the experimental group and class IV C with 23 students as the control group. The data collection technique uses test techniques, namely the pre-test and post-test questions in the form of multiple choices and brief descriptions. The results obtained in the experimental class, namely the class that in the experimental class that experienced learning with the local wisdom model, Gusjigang gained an increase in learning outcomes by 83 in the high category. The N-Gain results in the control class are students who are taught with conventional learning, students who get low n-gain results are 56%, students who get moderate N-gain results are 44%, and none of the students achieves n-gain results high. Whereas in the experimental class, the students who were taught using Gusjigang's local wisdom-based learning, students who got a low n-gain result of 9%, students who got a moderate n-gain of 56%, and students who achieved a high n-gain of 35 %. This shows that the acquisition of student learning outcomes in the experimental class is better than that of the control class.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 128 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 7 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Udayana University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Kusoro SiadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Woro SumarniAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Harjono HarjonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri HaryaniState University of Semarang3
Edy CahyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri WardaniUdayana University3
Kasmui KasmuiState University of Semarang2
Yosephine Debbie DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wisnu SunartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang2
Kasmadi Imam SupardiState University of Semarang2
Harjito HarjitoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Parmin ParminState University of Semarang2
Ersanghono KusumoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Melinda Dwi LestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nanik WijayatiState University of Semarang2
Ning SetiatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
sunyoto eko nugrohoState University of Semarang2
Aditya MariantiState University of Semarang2
Siti Herlina DewiState University of Semarang1
Eko Budi SusatyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Norma EralitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rr. S.E PujiastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Aryono AdhiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rr. Sri Endang PujiastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah Puji RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Danar SaddamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
salipah salipahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti Nur SuwaibahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sari NuryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SRI REJEKIUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Min Zahrotil UmamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nina FitrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wilis Okti PamungkasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nanik WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Meilani Dyah PalupiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi AndrianieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Local Wisdom Learning Approach Towards Students Learning Outcomes</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Febriani, Ema Rahma</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sudarmin, Sudarmin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Alimah, Siti</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study was to; analyze the differences between Gusjigang learning approach and conventional learning on student learning outcomes. The type of research used was a quantitative research method with a nonequivalent control group design. The population consisted of all fourth-grade students of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah TBS Kudus Regency. The sample was selected through a purposive sampling technique, so that class IV B was selected with 23 students as the experimental group and class IV C with 23 students as the control group. The data collection technique uses test techniques, namely the pre-test and post-test questions in the form of multiple choices and brief descriptions. The results obtained in the experimental class, namely the class that in the experimental class that experienced learning with the local wisdom model, Gusjigang gained an increase in learning outcomes by 83 in the high category. The N-Gain results in the control class are students who are taught with conventional learning, students who get low n-gain results are 56%, students who get moderate N-gain results are 44%, and none of the students achieves n-gain results high. Whereas in the experimental class, the students who were taught using Gusjigang's local wisdom-based learning, students who got a low n-gain result of 9%, students who got a moderate n-gain of 56%, and students who achieved a high n-gain of 35 %. This shows that the acquisition of student learning outcomes in the experimental class is better than that of the control class.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/31352</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 8 No 5 (2019): June 2019; 197-205</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/31352/13605</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>