Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Implementation of Predict Observe Explain Model and Outdoor Guided Inquiry in Improving Students' Critical Thinking in Science Learning

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 8 No. 9 (2019) · hlm. 248–253

DOI
10.15294/jpe.v10i3.34898
ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Terbit
2019-10-17
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the implementation of Predict Observe Explain (POE) learning models for increasing critical thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students, analyze the Implementation of Outdoor Guided Inquiry learning models in increasing critical thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students, comparing the effectiveness of POE learning model and Outdoor Guided Inquiry in the critical thinking ability of fifth grade elementary school students. This research used a quasi-experiment with pre-test and post-test control group design. The population and sample taken in this study were all fifth-grade students of SD Negeri 1 Sambong (eksperimen group) and SD Negeri 3 Sambong (control group), totaling 42 students. The experimental group was intervened by Outdoor Guided Inquiry while the control group by Predict Observe Explain. In this study data were taken using test instrument and questionners. Data analysis techniques used in this study were independent samples t-test, and classical completeness test and N-gain test. N-gain calculation results show that the average in the OGI class is 0.61, and the POE class is 0.38, which means that the Outdoor Guided Inquiry model is better in improving students' critical thinking abilitis compared to the Predict Observe Explain model. Based on the t-test calculation of OGY and POE classes, ttable = 2.021 and tvalue = 4.265, so tvalue > ttable shows that the OGI learning model is significantly better than the POE model.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 165 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 10 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Muria Kudus University
  • Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Udi UtomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang6
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang5
Lisdiana LisdianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Novi Ratna DewiState University of Semarang3
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang3
Hartono HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sudarmin SudarminAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri NgabektiState University of Semarang3
Bambang SubaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Haryono HaryonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Siti AlimahState University of Semarang2
Ari WidodoIndonesia University of Education2
Retno Sri IswariState University of Semarang2
Faruq AlfiantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Margareta RahayuningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang2
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang2
Aditya MariantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Amin RetnoningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Farid AhmadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Andin IrsadiState University of Semarang2
Barokah IsdaryantiState University of Semarang2
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang2
Sri haryaniState University of Semarang1
Sekar Dwi ArdiantiMuria Kudus University1
Savitri WanabuliandariMuria Kudus University1
Miftah RahmanState University of Semarang1
Yohanes Leonardus SukestiyarnoState University of Semarang1
Wahyu WidodoSultan Agung Islamic University1
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang1
Nuryani Yogipratama RustamanIndonesia University of Education1
Saefudin -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
R. Susanti R. SusantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitri Arum SasiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nafisatul LailaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Lintang Dhien HayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Implementation of Predict Observe Explain Model and Outdoor Guided Inquiry in Improving Students' Critical Thinking in Science Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Setyaningrum, Devi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Florentinus, Totok Sumaryanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Saptono, Sigit</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to analyze the implementation of Predict Observe Explain (POE) learning models for increasing critical thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students, analyze the Implementation of Outdoor Guided Inquiry learning models in increasing critical thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students, comparing the effectiveness of POE learning model and Outdoor Guided Inquiry in the critical thinking ability of fifth grade elementary school students. This research used a quasi-experiment with pre-test and post-test control group design. The population and sample taken in this study were all fifth-grade students of SD Negeri 1 Sambong (eksperimen group) and SD Negeri 3 Sambong (control group), totaling 42 students. The experimental group was intervened by Outdoor Guided Inquiry while the control group by Predict Observe Explain.&amp;nbsp; In this study data were taken using test instrument and questionners. Data analysis techniques used in this study were independent samples t-test, and classical completeness test and N-gain test. N-gain calculation results show that the average in the OGI class is 0.61, and the POE class is 0.38, which means that the Outdoor Guided Inquiry model is better in improving students' critical thinking abilitis compared to the Predict Observe Explain model. Based on the t-test calculation of OGY and POE classes, ttable = 2.021 and tvalue = 4.265, so tvalue &amp;gt; ttable shows that the OGI learning model is significantly better than the POE model.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-10-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/34898</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpe.v10i3.34898</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 8 No 9 (2019): November 2019; 248-253</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpe.v10i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/34898/14431</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>