Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Identifikasi Profil Kesulitan Belajar Fisika Topik Fluida Statis pada Siswa SMA di Kabupaten Demak

Unnes Physics Education Journal · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · hlm. 1–6

DOI
10.15294/upej.v7i1.22475
ISSN
2503-2313, 2252-6935
Terbit
2018-03-22
Penerbit
UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The purpose of this study was to identify students' learning difficulty profile on the topic of static fluid. The study was conducted in three high schools in Demak. Student learning difficulties profiles were measured using a diagnostic test instrument in the form of multiple open-ended options totaling 13 items. To strengthen the data is done interview with some students. Learning difficulties profiles are diagnosed with five approaches, namely learning objectives, material profiles, prerequisite knowledge, misconceptions, and structured knowledge. The results showed that the percentage of learning objectives for each indicator understood the concept of hydrostatic pressure, comparing the hydrostatic pressure on different liquids, understanding Pascal's legal concepts, understanding the concept of the law of Archimedes in floating, floating, and drowning phenomena, and explaining the buoyant force in a row 58.33%; 75.96%; 57.21%; 81.25%; and 98.56%. Percentage of hydrostatic pressure material profile, Pascal law and Archimedes law were 68.40%; 57.21%; and 89.90%. For prerequisite knowledge with 12% percentage, the percentage of material misconception of hydrostatic pressure and Pascal law are 48.08% and 48.08% respectively and knowledge is structured with 4.07% percentage.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 199 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 18 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Muria Kudus University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Bambang SubaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang8
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang7
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang7
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang6
Hartono HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Budi AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar6
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang5
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang5
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang4
Suharto LinuwihAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Sarwi SarwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang3
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang3
. SupriyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga3
Mahardika Prasetya AjiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ridho Adi NegoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Isa AkhlisState University of Semarang3
Wahyu HardyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Langlang HandayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
S. SulhadiState University of Semarang2
Fina FakhriyahMuria Kudus University2
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang2
KhumaediState University of Semarang2
Suraji SurajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Roudloh Muna LiaState University of Semarang2
R SusantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sulhadi SulhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wahyu JalaluddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nathan HindartoState University of Semarang2
Qisthi FariyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fianti FiantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dewi Liesnoor SetyowatiState University of Semarang2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Identifikasi Profil Kesulitan Belajar Fisika Topik Fluida Statis pada Siswa SMA di Kabupaten Demak</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Adi, Alik Sus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sugiyanto, Sugiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rusilowati, Ani</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study was to identify students' learning difficulty profile on the topic of static fluid. The study was conducted in three high schools in Demak. Student learning difficulties profiles were measured using a diagnostic test instrument in the form of multiple open-ended options totaling 13 items. To strengthen the data is done interview with some students. Learning difficulties profiles are diagnosed with five approaches, namely learning objectives, material profiles, prerequisite knowledge, misconceptions, and structured knowledge. The results showed that the percentage of learning objectives for each indicator understood the concept of hydrostatic pressure, comparing the hydrostatic pressure on different liquids, understanding Pascal's legal concepts, understanding the concept of the law of Archimedes in floating, floating, and drowning phenomena, and explaining the buoyant force in a row 58.33%; 75.96%; 57.21%; 81.25%; and 98.56%. Percentage of hydrostatic pressure material profile, Pascal law and Archimedes law were 68.40%; 57.21%; and 89.90%. For prerequisite knowledge with 12% percentage, the percentage of material misconception of hydrostatic pressure and Pascal law are 48.08% and 48.08% respectively and knowledge is structured with 4.07% percentage.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-03-22</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/22475</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/upej.v7i1.22475</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal; Vol 7 No 1 (2018); 1-6</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-2313</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6935</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/22475/10653</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 UPEJ   Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>