Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Analisis Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa pada Materi Hukum Ke-2 Termodinamika

Unnes Physics Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2021) · hlm. 264–273

DOI
10.15294/upej.v10i3.55697
ISSN
2503-2313, 2252-6935
Terbit
2021-11-22
Penerbit
UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The purpose of this study was to analyze students' higher-order thinking on the material of the 2nd law of Thermodynamics. The subjects of this study were grade 12 students of SMAN 1 Jakenan for the academic year 2020/2021 as many as 127 students who had taken physics lessons on the material of the 2nd law of Thermodynamics. The selection of students using snowball sampling technique. The method of data collection in this study used a question instrument, and interviews. Based on the data from the test results, the researchers calculated the validity and reliability. Interviews are used to find out how students think further in solving problems. Interviews were only conducted to 15 students who were selected from the categories of high, medium, and low ability students based on the test results that had been given. The data analysis technique used is the Miles and Huberman model data analysis technique which includes three simultaneous activities: (1) data reduction (2) data presentation, and (3) conclusion drawing (verification). Based on the data analysis and discussion in this study, it can be concluded that the instrument used is a set of higher-order thinking ability assessment instruments to measure higher-order thinking skills in the form of 6 two-tier multiple choice questions and is given online due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on the validity and reliability tests, the content validity of the developed higher order thinking skills assessment instrument has a very decent category. The empirical validity of 100% of the questions is declared valid. The question instrument developed has declared reliable with high criteria. Based on the analysis that has been done, it can also be concluded that students who have high-level thinking skills and are able to solve existing problems correctly and are able to explain them. Meanwhile, students who have low-level thinking skills cannot answer correctly, only guess and do not know how to do it.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 130 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 7 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • University of Szeged
  • Diponegoro University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang4
Sulhadi SulhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Navies LuthvitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Lisdiana LisdianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang2
Achmad SopyanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sudarmin SudarminAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang2
Bambang SubaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang2
. HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hadi SusantoNational Research and Innovation Agency2
Isa AkhlisState University of Semarang2
Budi AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Supriyadi SupriyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
. SupriyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Khumaedi KhumaediAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Novi Ratna DewiState University of Semarang1
Prasetyo ListiajiUniversity of Szeged1
Stephani Diah PamelasariState University of Semarang1
Sigit PriatmokoState University of Semarang1
Andin Vita AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ngurah Made D. PAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hadi MulyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Intan KusumawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hasbi IskandarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cristian DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Danang Triasmoro AdhiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad IrsyadAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suhardi EffendyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Faiz MudhofirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Murbangun NuswowatiState University of Semarang1
Hayu RistinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad Yanuar Habibur RahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Woro SumarniState University of Semarang1
Umi Roufatuz ZahroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sutikno SutiknoDiponegoro University1
Ninda Yera Setyo NainggolanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analisis Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa pada Materi Hukum Ke-2 Termodinamika</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Safutra, Yosie</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Linuwih, Suharto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The purpose of this study was to analyze students' higher-order thinking on the material of the 2nd law of Thermodynamics. The subjects of this study were grade 12 students of SMAN 1 Jakenan for the academic year 2020/2021 as many as 127 students who had taken physics lessons on the material of the 2nd law of Thermodynamics. The selection of students using snowball sampling technique. The method of data collection in this study used a question instrument, and interviews. Based on the data from the test results, the researchers calculated the validity and reliability. Interviews are used to find out how students think further in solving problems. Interviews were only conducted to 15 students who were selected from the categories of high, medium, and low ability students based on the test results that had been given. The data analysis technique used is the Miles and Huberman model data analysis technique which includes three simultaneous activities: (1) data reduction (2) data presentation, and (3) conclusion drawing (verification). Based on the data analysis and discussion in this study, it can be concluded that the instrument used is a set of higher-order thinking ability assessment instruments to measure higher-order thinking skills in the form of 6 two-tier multiple choice questions and is given online due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on the validity and reliability tests, the content validity of the developed higher order thinking skills assessment instrument has a very decent category. The empirical validity of 100% of the questions is declared valid. The question instrument developed has declared reliable with high criteria. Based on the analysis that has been done, it can also be concluded that students who have high-level thinking skills and are able to solve existing problems correctly and are able to explain them. Meanwhile, students who have low-level thinking skills cannot answer correctly, only guess and do not know how to do it.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-11-22</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/55697</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/upej.v10i3.55697</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal; Vol 10 No 3 (2021); 264-273</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-2313</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6935</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/55697/21305</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 UPEJ   Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>