Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Proses Komunikasi dan Partisipasi dalam Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa

Buletin Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Haluoleo · Vol. 12 No. 22 (2010) · pp. 50–67

DOI
10.33772/bpsosek.v12i22.5832
ISSN
2656-4270
Published
2010-04-01
Publisher
Department of Agribusiness Halu Oleo University Kendari Southeast Sulawesi
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The Subject of this study are (1) analyze rural community participation in the Raksa Desa Program, to indicate the specific factor and determine the level of rural community participation, (2) to identify the accuracy/effectiveness of Raksa Desa Program in developing participation by communication process, and (3) to find out the formula for increasing rural community participation in Raksa Desa program by effective communication. This study was conducted by the survey in three villages of Ciampea subdistrict, they are Cinangka, Bojong Jengkol, and Cibanteng villages. The technical sampling was determined by stratified random sampling with the level of activeness. The respondent was 74 person who had received a gift of Raksa Desa Program in the batch-1. The result shows that firstly, community in these three villages have low in education, experience, and income; secondly the government intervention is high; thirdly, the communication process is dominated by top-down model; fourthly, participation criteria that are chance, ability, and motivation are also still low; fifth, the rural community participation in Raksa Desa Program is low. The government intervention by top-down communication is not effective in increasing participation criteria (chance, ability, and motivation) of the rural community in Raksa Desa Program. So, the rural community participation in Raksa Desa Program is low, because this program does not match with community needs. The rural participation is Raksa Desa Program can be improved by interactive and convergent communication process.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 126 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Muhammad Syukri SadimantaraUniversitas Halu Oleo15
SRI REJEKIUniversitas Halu Oleo15
Andi KhaeruniUniversitas Halu Oleo10
RH Fitri FaradillaAffiliation unknown10
Ansharullah AnsharullahUniversitas Halu Oleo10
Hermanto HermantoAffiliation unknown8
Nur AsyikUniversitas Halu Oleo6
Asnani AsnaniAffiliation unknown6
Tamrin TamrinAffiliation unknown5
Sri KadarwatiState University of Semarang5
La KarimunaAffiliation unknown4
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown4
Sigit PriatmokoState University of Semarang4
Sarinah SarinahAffiliation unknown3
Prima Endang SusilowatiAffiliation unknown3
Subiyanto Hadi SaputroAffiliation unknown3
Jumaeri JumaeriAffiliation unknown3
Zuraidah ZuraidahAffiliation unknown3
Thamrin AzisAffiliation unknown2
Mashuni MashuniAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Zakir MuzakkarAffiliation unknown2
Abdu Rahman BacoAffiliation unknown2
Kobajashi Togo IsamuAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown2
Yuni Dwi SusantiAffiliation unknown2
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown2
F. ‪Widhi MahatmantiAffiliation unknown2
Harjito HarjitoAffiliation unknown2
Agung Tri PrasetyaState University of Semarang2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Muh Fakhrihun Na'amAffiliation unknown2
Sri Endah WahyuningsihAffiliation unknown2
Muliana MulianaAffiliation unknown2
Kurnia FebiantiAffiliation unknown2
Safrika SafrikaAffiliation unknown1
Bagio BagioAffiliation unknown1
Rezqi MaliaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/sosek/oai, first harvested 30 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Proses Komunikasi dan Partisipasi dalam Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Wahyuni, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Communication process, public participation, Raksa Desa Program.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The Subject of this study are (1) analyze rural community participation in the Raksa Desa Program, to indicate the specific factor and determine the level of rural community participation, (2) to identify the accuracy/effectiveness of Raksa Desa Program in developing participation by communication process, and (3) to find out the formula for increasing rural community participation in Raksa Desa program by effective communication. This study was conducted by the survey in three villages of Ciampea subdistrict, they are Cinangka, Bojong Jengkol, and Cibanteng villages. The technical sampling was determined by stratified random sampling with the level of activeness. The respondent was 74 person who had received a gift of Raksa Desa Program in the batch-1. The result shows that firstly, community in these three villages have low in education, experience, and income; secondly the government intervention is high; thirdly, the communication process is dominated by top-down model; fourthly, participation criteria that are chance, ability, and motivation are also still low; fifth, the rural community participation in Raksa Desa Program is low. The government intervention by top-down communication is not effective in increasing participation criteria (chance, ability, and motivation) of the rural community in Raksa Desa Program. So, the rural community participation in Raksa Desa Program is low, because this program does not match with community needs. The rural participation is Raksa Desa Program can be improved by interactive and convergent communication process.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Agribusiness Halu Oleo University Kendari Southeast Sulawesi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2010-04-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/sosek/article/view/5832</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33772/bpsosek.v12i22.5832</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Buletin Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Haluoleo; Vol 12, No 22 (2010); 50 - 67</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2656-4270</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.37149/bpsosek.v12i22</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/sosek/article/view/5832/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2010 Buletin Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Haluoleo</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>