Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

PENGEMBANGAN ALAT EVALUASI PROPOSITION GENERATING TASK UNTUK MENGUKUR STRUKTUR KOGNITIF SISWA DI SMA

Journal of Innovative Science Education · Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012)

ISSN
2502-4523, 2252-6412
Published
2012-11-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

AbstrakEvaluasi merupakan hal yang penting dalam pembelajaran. Selama ini beberapa peneliti pendidikan telah menerapkan peta konsep, wawancara klinis dan semanticnetwork untuk mengukur struktur kognitif, namun masing-masing alat evaluasi tersebut memiliki kekurangan. Alat evaluasi Proposition Generating Task (PGT)dapat digunakan sebagai alternatif lain untuk mengukur struktur kognitif siswa.Hasil yang diperoleh adalah seperangkat alat evaluasi yang terdiri dari beberapa komponen: a) penjelasan alat evaluasi PGT, b) pedoman pembuatan proposisi, c)kisi-kisi soal, d) soal, e) proposisi master, f) pedoman penilaian dan penskoran, g)pedoman interpretasi. Alat evaluasi PGT mempunyai nilai validitas 0,74 dan koefisien reliabilitas 0,99. Alat evaluasi PGT valid dan reliabel untuk mengukur pemahaman konsep siswa. Struktur kognitif siswa yang terukur dengan PGT dan peta konsep menunjukkan hasil yang sama yaitu berada pada level II (cukup baik), III(baik) dan IV (sangat baik).AbstractAssessment is important thing in learning. All this time some education researchers have applied concept map, clinical and semantic network to measure cognitive structure, however each evaluation instrument has deficiency. The evaluation instrument of Proposition GeneratingTask (PGT) can be used as other alternative to measure the student’s cognitive structure. Thedevelopment of evaluation instrument PGT on force and motion studying material with theaim to get the evaluation instrument PGT that’s valid, reliable, and can describethe student’scognitive structure on force and motion studying material for Senior High School students.The result that’s got is a set of evaluation instrument that contains some components: a) theexplanation of evaluation instrument PGT, b) the direction of making proposition, c) itemgrille, d) item, e) master proposition, f) measurement and suspension/ scoring direction, g)interpretation direction. The evaluation instrument PGT has validity value 0,74 and reliabilitycoef ficient 0,99. The evaluation instrument PGT is valid and reliable to measure theconcept student’s understanding. The student’s cognitive structure that’s measured with PGTand concept map shows the same result namely on the level II (good enough), III (good), andIV (very good).

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 191 co-authorship links · 13 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang10
Triyanto TriyantoAffiliation unknown9
Bambang SubaliAffiliation unknown9
Agus CahyonoAffiliation unknown8
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang8
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang7
Wahyu LestariAffiliation unknown7
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang6
Malarsih MalarsihAffiliation unknown5
Udi UtomoAffiliation unknown5
Sarwi SarwiAffiliation unknown5
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang5
Budi AstutiAffiliation unknown4
Supriyadi SupriyadiAffiliation unknown4
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar4
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang4
Suharto LinuwihAffiliation unknown4
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang4
Sulhadi SulhadiAffiliation unknown4
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang4
Totok Sumaryanto FlorentinusState University of Semarang3
Syakir SyakirAffiliation unknown3
Restu LanjariAffiliation unknown3
. SupriyadiAffiliation unknown3
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga3
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown3
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang3
Ian YuliantiAffiliation unknown3
Khumaedi KhumaediAffiliation unknown3
Langlang HandayaniAffiliation unknown3
Masturi MasturiState University of Semarang3
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang2
KhumaediState University of Semarang2
Roudloh Muna LiaAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad KhumaediAffiliation unknown2
Suharto SuhartoAffiliation unknown1
Budi UtomoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PENGEMBANGAN ALAT EVALUASI PROPOSITION GENERATING TASK UNTUK MENGUKUR STRUKTUR KOGNITIF SISWA DI SMA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Setyawardani, Dyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rusilowati, Ani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartono, Hartono</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">AbstrakEvaluasi merupakan hal yang penting dalam pembelajaran. Selama ini beberapa peneliti pendidikan telah menerapkan peta konsep, wawancara klinis dan semanticnetwork untuk mengukur struktur kognitif, namun masing-masing alat evaluasi tersebut memiliki kekurangan. Alat evaluasi Proposition Generating Task (PGT)dapat digunakan sebagai alternatif  lain untuk mengukur struktur kognitif  siswa.Hasil yang diperoleh adalah seperangkat alat evaluasi yang terdiri dari beberapa komponen: a) penjelasan alat evaluasi PGT, b) pedoman pembuatan proposisi, c)kisi-kisi soal, d) soal, e) proposisi master, f) pedoman penilaian dan penskoran, g)pedoman interpretasi. Alat evaluasi PGT mempunyai nilai validitas 0,74 dan koefisien reliabilitas 0,99. Alat evaluasi PGT valid dan reliabel untuk mengukur pemahaman konsep siswa. Struktur kognitif  siswa yang terukur dengan PGT dan peta konsep menunjukkan hasil yang sama yaitu berada pada level II (cukup baik), III(baik) dan IV (sangat baik).AbstractAssessment is important thing in learning. All this time some education researchers have applied concept map, clinical and semantic network to measure cognitive structure, however each evaluation instrument has deficiency. The evaluation instrument of  Proposition GeneratingTask (PGT) can be used as other alternative to measure the student’s cognitive structure. Thedevelopment of  evaluation instrument PGT on force and motion studying material with theaim to get the evaluation instrument PGT that’s valid, reliable, and can describethe student’scognitive structure on force and motion studying material for Senior High School students.The result that’s got is a set of  evaluation instrument that contains some components: a) theexplanation of  evaluation instrument PGT, b)  the direction of  making proposition, c) itemgrille, d) item, e) master proposition, f) measurement and suspension/ scoring direction, g)interpretation direction. The evaluation instrument PGT has validity value 0,74 and reliabilitycoef ficient 0,99. The evaluation instrument PGT is valid and reliable to measure theconcept student’s understanding. The student’s cognitive structure that’s measured with PGTand concept map shows the same result namely on the level II (good enough), III (good), andIV (very good).</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2012-11-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jise/article/view/629</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Innovative Science Education; Vol 1 No 2 (2012)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4523</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6412</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jise/article/view/629/615</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>