Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Based on KOLB Learning Style in Creative Problem-Solving Learning Models

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 8 No. 8 (2019) · pp. 121–132

DOI
10.15294/jpe.v10i2.34309
ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Published
2019-09-26
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of learning of the CPS learning model on the ability to solve math problems in fifth-grade students and describe the patterns of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities in terms of learning styles. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with the subject of fifth-grade students at Public Elementary School 1 Kalibawang, Wonosobo consisting of 18 students. The instruments used in this study were test and interview instruments. Data analysis includes reduction, presentation of data, and conclusion. The results showed the quality of learning with the CPS learning model on the ability to solve mathematical problems in both categories. It is shown with the results of the validation of proper learning tools, good quality learning, and the average score of students completing. Students with convergent learning styles can solve problems until the stage of re-checking, but at the stage of planning problem-solving lacks detail. Students with divergent learning styles can solve problems up to the stage of checking back, and can solve them well. Students with an assimilation learning style can solve problem until the re-checking stage, but at the planning stage of problem-solving are not perfect. Students with accommodation learning style can solve problem until re-checking stage, but at the stage of carrying out problem solving are not complete.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 174 co-authorship links · 11 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang6
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga6
Mohammad AsikinAffiliation unknown5
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang5
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar4
St. Budi WaluyaAffiliation unknown4
Teguh DarsonoAffiliation unknown3
Siti WahyuniAffiliation unknown3
Suharto LinuwihAffiliation unknown3
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang3
Hardi SuyitnoAffiliation unknown3
Isnarto IsnartoAffiliation unknown3
Adi Satrio ArdiansyahAffiliation unknown3
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang2
Wahyu JalaluddinAffiliation unknown2
Joko WidodoAffiliation unknown2
Nathan HindartoState University of Semarang2
Agus YuliantoAffiliation unknown2
Kasmadi Imam SupardiState University of Semarang2
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Rochmad RochmadAffiliation unknown2
Nuriana Rachmani DewiAffiliation unknown2
Amin SuyitnoAffiliation unknown2
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang2
Batul Fatin HendrianiAffiliation unknown2
I. JunaediAffiliation unknown2
R. JiwaniAffiliation unknown2
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown2
Mahardika Prasetya AjiAffiliation unknown2
Supriyadi SupriyadiAffiliation unknown2
Lathifatun Ni’mahAffiliation unknown1
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang1
Isa AkhlisState University of Semarang1
Wahyu HardyantoAffiliation unknown1
Arief YuliantoState University of Semarang1
Elok Arina YunitaAffiliation unknown1
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Based on KOLB Learning Style in Creative Problem-Solving Learning Models</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Muttaqin, Wahyu Eka Putra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Junaedi, Iwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sulhadi, Sulhadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of learning of the CPS learning model on the ability to solve math problems in fifth-grade students and describe the patterns of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities in terms of learning styles. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with the subject of fifth-grade students at Public Elementary School 1 Kalibawang, Wonosobo consisting of 18 students. The instruments used in this study were test and interview instruments. Data analysis includes reduction, presentation of data, and conclusion. The results showed the quality of learning with the CPS learning model on the ability to solve mathematical problems in both categories. It is shown with the results of the validation of proper learning tools, good quality learning, and the average score of students completing. Students with convergent learning styles can solve problems until the stage of re-checking, but at the stage of planning problem-solving lacks detail. Students with divergent learning styles can solve problems up to the stage of checking back, and can solve them well. Students with an assimilation learning style can solve problem until the re-checking stage, but at the planning stage of problem-solving are not perfect. Students with accommodation learning style can solve problem until re-checking stage, but at the stage of carrying out problem solving are not complete.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-09-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/34309</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpe.v10i2.34309</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 8 No 8 (2019): October 2019; 121-132</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpe.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/34309/14284</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>