Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Relationship between Learning Resources and Students’ Learning Methods on Biology Student Learning Outcomes in XI MIPA Class

Journal of Biology Education · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020) · pp. 49–56

DOI
10.15294/jbe.v9i1.38006
ISSN
2540-833X, 2252-6579
Published
2020-04-20
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The achievement of student learning outcomes is influenced by various factors, such as learning resources and ways of learning. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between learning resources and learning outcomes; know the relationship between how to learn and the learning outcomes; and know the relationship between learning resources and ways of learning on the learning outcomes. The sample in this study was 108 students. The independent variables in this study are learning resources (X1) and ways of learning (X2). The dependent variable in this study is learning outcomes (Y). The data collection method used a questionnaire and documentation. Data analysis in this study used descriptive percentages, multiple linear regression, t test and F test. The results showed that the analysis of multiple linear regression obtained equation: Y = 52.078 + 0.224X1 + 0.203X2. Partially, the influence of learning resources on learning outcomes was 43.3%, while the influence of learning methods was 42.6%. Simultaneously, learning resources and ways of learning influenced the learning outcomes by 47.3%, with SE (X1) = 24.6%, and SE (X2) = 22.7%. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that learning resources and ways of learning significantly influenced learning outcomes, both partially and simultaneously. In this study, learning resources had a greater influence on learning outcomes compared to the of way of learning on learning outcomes. Thus, schools need to optimize all learning resources both in their existence and utilization, and students need to improve their way of learning in order to get optimal learning outcomes.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 168 co-authorship links · 4 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Institut Teknologi dan Kesehatan Avicenna
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Aditya MariantiAffiliation unknown10
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang6
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang4
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang3
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang3
Supriyanto .Affiliation unknown3
Ari YuniastutiState University of Semarang3
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang3
Siti AlimahState University of Semarang3
Suraji SurajiAffiliation unknown2
Roudloh Muna LiaState University of Semarang2
R SusantiAffiliation unknown2
Nur Kusuma DewiAffiliation unknown2
Eni Widya NingsihAffiliation unknown2
Bambang SubaliAffiliation unknown2
Sri Mulyani Endang SusilowatiAffiliation unknown2
Diana Putri RistianafiAffiliation unknown2
Suharto LinuwihAffiliation unknown2
Andreas Priyono Budi PrasetyoAffiliation unknown2
Wulan ChristijantiAffiliation unknown2
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang2
Nana Kariada Tri MartutiAffiliation unknown2
Lisdiana LisdianaAffiliation unknown2
Kukuh SantosaAffiliation unknown2
Andin IrsadiState University of Semarang2
Novi Ratna DewiState University of Semarang1
A. KurniawatiState University of Semarang1
Y. A. SujatmikoState University of Semarang1
P. PujiasihState University of Semarang1
Supriyadi SupriyadiInstitut Teknologi dan Kesehatan Avicenna1
Muhammad KhumaediState University of Semarang1
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang1
Supriyadi SupriyadiState University of Semarang1
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang1
okvita sariAffiliation unknown1
Herlina OktavianiAffiliation unknown1
Stella FlorensiaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Relationship between Learning Resources and Students’ Learning Methods on Biology Student Learning Outcomes in XI MIPA Class</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sari, Mustika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Utami, Nur Rahayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Isnaeni, Wiwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The achievement of student learning outcomes is influenced by various factors, such as learning resources and ways of learning. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between learning resources and learning outcomes; know the relationship between how to learn and the learning outcomes; and know the relationship between learning resources and ways of learning on the learning outcomes. The sample in this study was 108 students. The independent variables in this study are learning resources (X1) and ways of learning (X2). The dependent variable in this study is learning outcomes (Y). The data collection method used a questionnaire and documentation. Data analysis in this study used descriptive percentages, multiple linear regression, t test and F test. The results showed that the analysis of multiple linear regression obtained equation: Y = 52.078 + 0.224X1 + 0.203X2. Partially, the influence of learning resources on learning outcomes was 43.3%, while the influence of learning methods was 42.6%. Simultaneously, learning resources and ways of learning influenced the learning outcomes by 47.3%, with SE (X1) = 24.6%, and SE (X2) = 22.7%. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that learning resources and ways of learning significantly influenced learning outcomes, both partially and simultaneously. In this study, learning resources had a greater influence on learning outcomes compared to the of way of learning on learning outcomes. Thus, schools need to optimize all learning resources both in their existence and utilization, and students need to improve their way of learning in order to get optimal learning outcomes.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-04-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujbe/article/view/38006</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jbe.v9i1.38006</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Biology Education; Vol 9 No 1 (2020): April 2020; 49-56</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2540-833X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jbe.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujbe/article/view/38006/15811</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Biology Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>