Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

“I am forced to speak, but it’s okay”: Black Box for Students with Lower Levels of Willingness to Communicate

Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025) · pp. 271–287

DOI
10.31332/lkw.v11i2.8478
ISSN
2549-9017, 2460-2280
Published
2025-12-11
Publisher
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate students’ perceptions of the “Black Box” technique and its influence on their Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in an EFL classroom. Prior to examining students’ perceptions, their WTC levels were identified using WTC indicators adapted from Weaver’s work (2015). Data were collected through a close-ended questionnaire, reflection questions, and semi-structured interviews. The results indicate that the students were at moderate and high levels of WTC. Five major themes were identified using Braun and Clarke’s (2017) thematic analysis: general impression and awareness of Black Box, engagement and interest, learning experience, learning impact, and challenges and benefits of implementation. Findings reveal that both moderate- and high-WTC students perceived the use of Black Box positively, although in slightly different ways. The technique appeared to foster students’ psychosocial states, such as confidence, reduced anxiety, and a sense of security during communication, which in turn encouraged them to speak more willingly in English. Overall, the Black Box can serve as an alternative pedagogical approach to enhance students’ communicative participation. However, the results are context-specific and limited to one classroom setting; therefore, broader generalizations should be made with caution.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 100 co-authorship links · 8 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • National Dong Hwa University
  • Monash University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Suhartini SyukriInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari6
Sitti NurfaidahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari5
Sarjaniah ZurInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari5
Diah AstutiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari3
Abdul HalimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari2
Abdul HalimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari2
Abdul HalimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari2
Siti AlawiyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari2
Chen Ching YangNational Dong Hwa University1
Sri RahayuInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Salmah SalmahAffiliation unknown1
Nurwijayanti NurwijayantiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Isna HumaeraInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Sitti NurmilaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Ija NarmalawatiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Abdul HalimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Susanti SusantiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Sucitra Juliana EmsilInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
La Ode MusaldinMonash University1
Abdul HalimAffiliation unknown1
Abdul HalimAffiliation unknown1
Siswah YuniantiAffiliation unknown1
Lusi DamayantiAffiliation unknown1
Azwar AbidinInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Cian SubarninAffiliation unknown1
Rikki Ramadhan AdamAffiliation unknown1
Olvi AprilliaAffiliation unknown1
M Wahyuddin MasdinAffiliation unknown1
Anita RezkiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Horst Tonn-MellerAffiliation unknown1
Serliana SerlianaAffiliation unknown1
Abdul HalimAffiliation unknown1
Syarif RizaliaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Zakky FahriziInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
A. MagfiraInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2549-9017/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>“I am forced to speak, but it’s okay”: Black Box for Students with Lower Levels of Willingness to Communicate</dc:title><dc:creator>Atikah, Dewi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sukmawati, Sukmawati</dc:creator><dc:creator>Takulani, Abd Haris</dc:creator><dc:creator>Safei, Nur Hasanah</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This study aims to investigate students’ perceptions of the “Black Box” technique and its influence on their Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in an EFL classroom. Prior to examining students’ perceptions, their WTC levels were identified using WTC indicators adapted from Weaver’s work (2015). Data were collected through a close-ended questionnaire, reflection questions, and semi-structured interviews. The results indicate that the students were at moderate and high levels of WTC. Five major themes were identified using Braun and Clarke’s (2017) thematic analysis: general impression and awareness of Black Box, engagement and interest, learning experience, learning impact, and challenges and benefits of implementation. Findings reveal that both moderate- and high-WTC students perceived the use of Black Box positively, although in slightly different ways. The technique appeared to foster students’ psychosocial states, such as confidence, reduced anxiety, and a sense of security during communication, which in turn encouraged them to speak more willingly in English. Overall, the Black Box can serve as an alternative pedagogical approach to enhance students’ communicative participation. However, the results are context-specific and limited to one classroom setting; therefore, broader generalizations should be made with caution.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-12-11</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v11i2.8478</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.31332/lkw.v11i2.8478</dc:identifier><dc:source>Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English; Vol 11 No 2 (2025); 271-287</dc:source><dc:source>2549-9017</dc:source><dc:source>2460-2280</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/langkawi/article/download/8478/3777</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>