Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

TEACHER’S AND STUDENTS’ TALKS AND THEIR NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION IN THE CLASSROOM INTERACTION

English Education Journal · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015)

ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2015-08-22
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study were aimed to find (1) the pattern of teacher’s talks and students’ talks occurred during the classroom interaction, (2) identify teacher’s nonverbal communication and students’ nonverbal communication interpreted in their talks. This study was descriptive qualitative method. The participants of this study were one English teacher and 38 students of second semester of Cendekia Utama Nursing College. It used Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS), to analyze teacher’s and students’ talks and Zoric’s and Smid’s Taxonomy to identify nonverbal communication. The result showed that the most dominant pattern occurred in the classroom interaction at ESP class was the students’ participation. The teacher spent (55.7%) while students spent (40.3%) in their time. Teacher produced both direct talks and indirect talks. The amount of direct talks (29.1%) was higher than indirect talks (26.5%). It followed by content cross (34.7%), teacher support (14.3%) and continued by teacher control (6.7%), silence or confusion only spent a little time (4%). The result of nonverbal communication showed that teacher and students used more in oculasics and kinesics. They intentionally made eye contact when they communicated each other and used such facial expression, gesture, body signals, eye movement and head position to support their communications.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 130 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang PurwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rochyani LestiyanawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nyayu Yayu SuryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nesia OktaniaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Novi Rahmania AquarizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuliana YulianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka FatmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
wilis nurlelaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andini Lusiana SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widya AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Hamidah Ary RuchanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endah PurwantiUniversitas Airlangga1
Kathrina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul Malik Al HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syarifa ManullangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fatona SurayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri WahyuningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul MuhibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">TEACHER’S AND STUDENTS’ TALKS AND THEIR NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION IN THE CLASSROOM INTERACTION</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hafadhotul Husna, Arina</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartono, Rudi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sofwan, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study were aimed to find (1) the pattern of teacher’s talks and  students’ talks occurred during the classroom interaction, (2) identify teacher’s nonverbal communication and students’ nonverbal communication interpreted in their talks. This study was descriptive qualitative method. The participants of this study were one English teacher and 38 students of second semester of Cendekia Utama Nursing College. It used Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS), to analyze teacher’s and students’ talks and Zoric’s and Smid’s Taxonomy to identify nonverbal communication. The result showed that the most dominant pattern occurred in the classroom interaction at ESP class was the students’ participation. The teacher spent (55.7%) while students spent (40.3%) in their time. Teacher produced both direct talks and indirect talks. The amount of direct talks (29.1%) was higher than indirect talks (26.5%). It followed by content cross (34.7%), teacher support (14.3%) and continued by teacher control (6.7%), silence or confusion only spent a little time (4%). The result of nonverbal communication showed that teacher and students used more in oculasics and kinesics. They intentionally made eye contact when they communicated each other and used such facial expression, gesture, body signals, eye movement and head position to support their communications.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2015-08-22</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/6839</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 5 No 1 (2015)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/6839/4907</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>