Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Cognitive and Structure-Proposition-Evaluation Strategies in Teaching TOEFL Reading Comprehension to High Low Motivated Students

English Education Journal · Vol. 8 No. 3 (2018) · hlm. 308–316

DOI
10.15294/eej.v8i3.23429
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2018-07-26
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The present study investigated the effectiveness of Cognitive and Structure-Proposition-Evaluation strategies in teaching TOEFL reading comprehension to high and low motivated students. An experimental research with factorial design 2x2 was used in this research. The first group was treated by using cognitive strategy and the other was treated by using SPE strategy. The motivational questionnaire was conducted for classifying the students upon the high and low motivation. The data were analyzed by applying Two-Way ANOVA. The result reveals that (1) cognitive strategy had a significant effect for teaching TOEFL reading comprehension among students with high and low motivated students, (2) SPE strategy had a significant effect for teaching TOEFL reading comprehension among high and low motivated students, (3) there was no significant difference between the students’ achievement after the implementation of cognitive and SPE strategies for teaching TOEFL reading comprehension among high and low motivated students, (4) there was no significant difference of students’ motivation in reading comprehension when they are taught by using cognitive and SPE strategies for high and low motivated students, (5) there was no interaction among teaching strategies (cognitive and structure-proposition-evaluation strategies), motivation (high and low motivated students), and students’ reading comprehension.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 136 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zumala HusnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini Susanti WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anindya PangestikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaely HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus PrayogoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andika Farid AbdillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Rofi’iAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ismi KusumaningroemAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Masfa MaizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daud JiwandonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad TauchidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dafi KhusnitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agnes Arum BudianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nor ChotimahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Cognitive and Structure-Proposition-Evaluation Strategies in Teaching TOEFL Reading Comprehension to High Low Motivated Students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Ekadini, Lulu'</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The present study investigated the effectiveness of Cognitive and Structure-Proposition-Evaluation strategies in teaching TOEFL reading comprehension to high and low motivated students. An experimental research with factorial design 2x2 was used in this research. The first group was treated by using cognitive strategy and the other was treated by using SPE strategy. The motivational questionnaire was conducted for classifying the students upon the high and low motivation. The data were analyzed by applying Two-Way ANOVA. The result reveals that (1) cognitive strategy had a significant effect for teaching TOEFL reading comprehension among students with high and low motivated students, (2) SPE strategy had a significant effect for teaching TOEFL reading comprehension among high and low motivated students, (3) there was no significant difference between the students’ achievement after the implementation of cognitive and SPE strategies for teaching TOEFL reading comprehension among high and low motivated students, (4) there was no significant difference of students’ motivation in reading comprehension when they are taught by using cognitive and SPE strategies for high and low motivated students, (5) there was no interaction among teaching strategies (cognitive and structure-proposition-evaluation strategies), motivation (high and low motivated students), and students’ reading comprehension.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-07-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/23429</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v8i3.23429</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 8 No 3 (2018): September 2018; 308-316</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v8i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/23429/11114</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>