Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Use of Politeness Strategies by Indonesian Vs Malaysian Student Debaters in the 2018 World Schools Debating Championship (WSDC)

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2020) · hlm. 282–291

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.36310
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2020-09-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The aims of this study were to analyze the types of politeness strategies realized by student debaters and how the Indonesian Vs Malaysian student debaters used politeness strategies in the debate competition. The data of this research were taken from youTube that video series of debate competition “WSDC 2018 R2: Indonesia VS Malaysia.” The study used a descriptive qualitative method which was analyzed using the politeness strategies propossed by (Brown and Levinson, 1987). The subjects in this study were 6 student debaters (2 teams) from Malaysia and Indonesia who participated in the 2018 World Schools Debating Championship (WSDC). This study found that most of the student debaters used positive politeness strategies to deliver their arguments appropriately. There were four types of politeness strategies realized by the debaters. Sub-strategies of positive politeness were mostly used by Indonesian debaters. They used sub-strategies of positive politeness to keep the hearer's positive face, to safe opinions when delivering arguments clearly as the opposition team and make the preposition team agreed with their insight. Malaysians used off-record strategy dominantly. They used inviting implicatures to imply meanings.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 150 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Pasca KalisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zumala HusnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini Susanti WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh. Akhdan Aufarizal IrhamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Zaid MuttaqinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alief Noor FaridaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anindya PangestikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Putri AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisa Nur AtikahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SetiowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdrurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaely HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mokhammad Pradana AjiasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Banggala Puja SenaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gracendy Aluz Clarita BudionoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Use of Politeness Strategies by Indonesian Vs Malaysian Student Debaters in the 2018 World Schools Debating Championship (WSDC)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nurrahmah, Nurrahmah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yuliasri, Issy</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The aims of this study were to analyze the types of politeness strategies realized by student debaters and how the Indonesian Vs Malaysian student debaters used politeness strategies in the debate competition. The data of this research were taken from youTube that video series of debate competition “WSDC 2018 R2: Indonesia VS Malaysia.” The study used a descriptive qualitative method which was analyzed using the politeness strategies propossed by (Brown and Levinson, 1987). The subjects in this study were 6 student debaters (2 teams) from Malaysia and Indonesia who participated in the 2018 World Schools Debating Championship (WSDC). This study found that most of the student debaters used positive politeness strategies to deliver their arguments appropriately. There were four types of politeness strategies realized by the debaters. Sub-strategies of positive politeness were mostly used by Indonesian debaters. They used sub-strategies of positive politeness to keep the hearer's positive face, to safe opinions when delivering arguments clearly as the opposition team and make the preposition team agreed with their insight. Malaysians used off-record strategy dominantly. They used inviting implicatures to imply meanings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/36310</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.36310</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 3 (2020): September 2020; 282-291</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/36310/15037</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>