Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Cohesion and Coherence in Final Project Abstracts Written by Non-English Department Undergraduate Students

English Education Journal · Vol. 11 No. 4 (2021) · hlm. 516–527

DOI
10.15294/eej.v11i1.47453
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2021-12-23
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Creating text needs to be understood that it is not only about arranging the words into sentences and paragraphs but also delivering meaning. Unfortunately, not everyone can achieve good skills in writing. This study aims at analyzing the writing skills of a group of Indonesian non-English department undergraduate students. It focused on the cohesion and coherence of their production of the final project abstract. Ten texts were analyzed by employing a discourse analytical case study. Thus, it is an important matter to analyze the writing competency of students as they are at the undergraduate level, majoring in Informatics Engineering that should report their final project in English. In this study, a theory from Halliday and Matthiessen (2014) was used to analyze the cohesion while a theory from Eggins (2004), Thornburry (2005), and Paltridge and Starfield (2007) were used to analyze the coherence. An open-ended questionnaire was used to confirm the result of the analysis according to the writers’ point of view. The findings indicate that the students show a bit of weakness in achieving cohesion and coherence in creating texts due to a lack of knowledge about the theory of cohesion and coherence. The result of the study can be used as a reference and consideration in designing a suitable lesson plan for writing class.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 134 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Cenderawasih University
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yuliana YulianaCenderawasih University2
Eka FatmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rosnawintang RosnawintangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur AzisahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Elisabeth Lenny MaritAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahrulman FahrulmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nyayu Yayu SuryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nesia OktaniaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Novi Rahmania AquarizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini MaulidhawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Januarius MujiantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
wilis nurlelaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andini Lusiana SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widya AmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Hamidah Ary RuchanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endah PurwantiUniversitas Airlangga1
Kathrina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul Malik Al HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Cohesion and Coherence in Final Project Abstracts Written by Non-English Department Undergraduate Students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Happy gusnar, Nindya Septarica</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartono, Rudi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suwandi, Suwandi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Creating text needs to be understood that it is not only about arranging the words into sentences and paragraphs but also delivering meaning. Unfortunately, not everyone can achieve good skills in writing. This study aims at analyzing the writing skills of a group of Indonesian non-English department undergraduate students. It focused on the cohesion and coherence of their production of the final project abstract. Ten texts were analyzed by employing a discourse analytical case study. Thus, it is an important matter to analyze the writing competency of students as they are at the undergraduate level, majoring in Informatics Engineering that should report their final project in English. In this study, a theory from Halliday and Matthiessen (2014) was used to analyze the cohesion while a theory from Eggins (2004), Thornburry (2005), and Paltridge and Starfield (2007) were used to analyze the coherence. An open-ended questionnaire was used to confirm the result of the analysis according to the writers’ point of view. The findings indicate that the students show a bit of weakness in achieving cohesion and coherence in creating texts due to a lack of knowledge about the theory of cohesion and coherence. The result of the study can be used as a reference and consideration in designing a suitable lesson plan for writing class.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-12-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/47453</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v11i1.47453</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 11 No 4 (2021): December 2021; 516-527</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v11i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/47453/19770</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>