Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Use of Adjacency Pair Patterns in “Ancora Meet” Interview with Nadiem Anwar Makarim

English Education Journal · Vol. 12 No. 4 (2022) · hlm. 459–469

DOI
10.15294/eej.v12i4.63166
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2022-12-23
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Conversation Analysis is an issue of Pragmatics. It is a way to analyze a conversation by its elements, such as turn-taking and adjacency pair produced by the speakers. In this present study, we conducted research in the field of conversation analysis. More specifically, we investigated the adjacency pair patterns, the meaning of the patterns, and the implicature of the patterns in the spoken interaction of the Ancora Meet discussion with Nadiem Anwar Makarim, Minister of Education and Culture of Indonesia, the Republic of Indonesia. This research investigates how adjacency pairs patterned in Ancora Meet’s interview with Nadiem Anwar Makarim, how meaning is made through the patterns, and how the implicature resulted from using the patterns. This present study used a qualitative method. We found eight patterns of adjacency pair construct in Ancora Meet, and then three maxims were realized in the discussion. This study also reveals some patterns. Individuals prefer to communicate information implicitly rather than explicitly. Particularised dialogue implicature dominance in the discussion is evidence that speakers are connected to the context to implicate utterances in their current conversation. The particularised conversation implicature’s violation of the maxim is evidence of a significant relationship between context and cooperative principles. Conversation implicatures are almost always connected to the context. Finally, we discovered 42 instances of Minister Nadiem’s implicature, demonstrating that, for the most part, conversational implicature is always connected to context. Meanwhile, in practical contribution, this research can be used as a reference in teaching English, especially speaking.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 131 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Qonita Nowindra RamadhaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anabela Romaito PangaribuanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zumala HusnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini Susanti WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anindya PangestikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaely HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus PrayogoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andika Farid AbdillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Rofi’iAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ismi KusumaningroemAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Masfa MaizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daud JiwandonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad TauchidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dafi KhusnitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Use of Adjacency Pair Patterns in “Ancora Meet” Interview with Nadiem Anwar Makarim</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Saptiyanto, Beni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Joko Yulianto, Henrikus</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Conversation Analysis is an issue of Pragmatics. It is a way to analyze a conversation by its elements, such as turn-taking and adjacency pair produced by the speakers. In this present study, we conducted research in the field of conversation analysis. More specifically, we investigated the adjacency pair patterns, the meaning of the patterns, and the implicature of the patterns in the spoken interaction of the Ancora Meet discussion with Nadiem Anwar Makarim, Minister of Education and Culture of Indonesia, the Republic of Indonesia. This research investigates how adjacency pairs patterned in Ancora Meet’s interview with Nadiem Anwar Makarim, how meaning is made through the patterns, and how the implicature resulted from using the patterns. This present study used a qualitative method. We found eight patterns of adjacency pair construct in Ancora Meet, and then three maxims were realized in the discussion. This study also reveals some patterns. Individuals prefer to communicate information implicitly rather than explicitly. Particularised dialogue implicature dominance in the discussion is evidence that speakers are connected to the context to implicate utterances in their current conversation. The particularised conversation implicature’s violation of the maxim is evidence of a significant relationship between context and cooperative principles. Conversation implicatures are almost always connected to the context. Finally, we discovered 42 instances of Minister Nadiem’s implicature, demonstrating that, for the most part, conversational implicature is always connected to context. Meanwhile, in practical contribution, this research can be used as a reference in teaching English, especially speaking.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-12-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/63166</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v12i4.63166</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 12 No 4 (2022): December 2022; 459-469</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v12i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/63166/23384</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>