Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Investigating Undergraduate Students Discourse Markers Used in Final Project Article of English Department at Universitas Negeri Semarang

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 3 (2023) · hlm. 340–350

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i3.72609
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2023-09-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Students' writing quality in academic writing must still be investigated. Especially in terms of coherence and arrangement between sentences, sometimes inaccuracies cause sentences written to be less meaningful. This study aims to: 1) describe the use of discourse markers in the final undergraduate student article projects, especially in the discussion section, and 2) explain how far the quality of undergraduate students' writing is in applying discourse markers. Discourse Markers are conjunctions used as hooks between sentences so that the linkages between sentences are maintained, and the meaning of the sentences can be easily understood. This study applies the theory of Discourse Markers by Fraser (2009), which is complemented by an explanation of material on Academic Writing based on the book Writing Academic English by Oshima and Hogue (2006). The instrument is in the form of documentation. This study's qualitative data for analysis came from 11 undergraduate students' final project articles focused on the discussion part only. Furthermore, the data is categorized into three types of Discourse Markers: contrastive, elaborative, and inferential. After that, the analysis results are also provided in the form of the quality of student writing which has been categorized as appropriate and less appropriate.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 152 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui17
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui13
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zumala HusnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini Susanti WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti NurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Saeful BahriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Katharina RustipaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anindya PangestikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah NurhidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lilis SulistiantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaely HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atika PurwaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Investigating Undergraduate Students Discourse Markers Used in Final Project Article of English Department at Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Alif, Wening Nur Habibah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Students' writing quality in academic writing must still be investigated. Especially in terms of coherence and arrangement between sentences, sometimes inaccuracies cause sentences written to be less meaningful. This study aims to: 1) describe the use of discourse markers in the final undergraduate student article projects, especially in the discussion section, and 2) explain how far the quality of undergraduate students' writing is in applying discourse markers. Discourse Markers are conjunctions used as hooks between sentences so that the linkages between sentences are maintained, and the meaning of the sentences can be easily understood. This study applies the theory of Discourse Markers by Fraser (2009), which is complemented by an explanation of material on Academic Writing based on the book Writing Academic English by Oshima and Hogue (2006). The instrument is in the form of documentation. This study's qualitative data for analysis came from 11 undergraduate students' final project articles focused on the discussion part only. Furthermore, the data is categorized into three types of Discourse Markers: contrastive, elaborative, and inferential. After that, the analysis results are also provided in the form of the quality of student writing which has been categorized as appropriate and less appropriate.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/72609</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i3.72609</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 3 (2023): September 2023; 340-350</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/72609/25996</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>