Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

THE PRACTICE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK USED BY A TEACHER IN TEACHING ENGLISH

ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · hlm. 80–91

DOI
10.15294/elt.v7i1.25310
ISSN
2721-4532, 2252-6706
Terbit
2018-08-30
Penerbit
English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study focuses on the practice of corrective feedback used by a teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School. The objective of the study is to describe the type of corrective feedback used by a teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School and to describe the frequency of each type of corrective feedback used by the teacher in teaching English in SD Semesta Bilingual School. This study is a qualitative research. The data were taken by interviewing an English teacher and taking video of teaching and learning process. The videos were transcribed which in the next step, they were analyzed for gaining the result. The data were analyzed in the noticing, collecting, and thinking process according to the theory of qualitative data analysis by Siedel (1998). According to the analysis, the teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School used all kinds of corrective feedback. The result shows that explicit feedback is the most frequent corrective feedback which represents 24.14%. The other strategies are as follows: (2) Recast occurs 17.24%, (3) Clarification Request occurs 13.79%,(4) Metalinguistic Feedback occurs 13.79%, (5) Elicitation occurss 13.79%, and (6) Repetition occurs 13.79%. The most dominant type of using corrective feedback is explicit correction. The implication of using corrective feedback on English speaking is that, the student will be brave to active on every teaching learning activity especially on speaking.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 148 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zumala HusnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini Susanti WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alief Noor FaridaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anindya PangestikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaely HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus PrayogoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andika Farid AbdillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Rofi’iAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ismi KusumaningroemAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Masfa MaizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daud JiwandonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad TauchidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE PRACTICE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK USED BY A TEACHER IN TEACHING ENGLISH</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Triwinarsih, Endah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kalisa, Pasca</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study focuses on the practice of corrective feedback used by a teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School. The objective of the study is to describe the type of corrective feedback used by a teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School and to describe the frequency of each type of corrective feedback used by the teacher in teaching English in SD Semesta Bilingual School. This study is a qualitative research. The data were taken by interviewing an English teacher and taking video of teaching and learning process. The videos were transcribed which in the next step, they were analyzed for gaining the result. The data were analyzed in the noticing, collecting, and thinking process according to the theory of qualitative data analysis by Siedel (1998). According to the analysis, the teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School used all kinds of corrective feedback. The result shows that explicit feedback is the most frequent corrective feedback which represents 24.14%. The other strategies are as follows: (2) Recast occurs 17.24%, (3) Clarification Request occurs 13.79%,(4) Metalinguistic Feedback occurs 13.79%, (5) Elicitation occurss 13.79%, and (6) Repetition occurs 13.79%. The most dominant type of using corrective feedback is explicit correction. The implication of using corrective feedback on English speaking is that, the student will be brave to active on every teaching learning activity especially on speaking.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-08-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/25310</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/elt.v7i1.25310</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; Vol 7 No 1 (2018): ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; 80-91</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-4532</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6706</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/elt.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/25310/11352</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>