Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Comparative Study of Hedges in Theses’ Abstracts Written by English and Indonesian Graduate Programs of Universitas Negeri Semarang

The Journal of Educational Development · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 91–100

DOI
10.15294/jed.v9i2.64412
ISSN
2502-4469, 2085-4943
Terbit
2021-12-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Hedges, to be softened and weaken the claims, which avoid being blamed, and the claim can be accepted, play an essential role in presenting academic research in masters’ theses abstracts. This case study aimed to explain the comparison of hedges in the English and Indonesian graduate programs theses abstracts. The qualitative analysis was undertaken into five sub-research questions to find out the English department's hedges, the Indonesian department's hedges, the similarities and differences between both and its consequences. The analysis was employed based on the taxonomy of Hyland (1998) manually. The sample was thirty master’s thesis abstracts of graduate students from the English and Indonesian graduate programs Universitas Negeri Semarang, published from 2018 to 2022 and accessed through an online library. The finding reveals that hedging functions such as writer-oriented hedges, accuracy-oriented hedges, and reader-oriented hedges are realized in English, and Indonesian thesis abstracts are mostly similar. Besides, the analysis finds some differences. One of them is the similar term employed to reach different hedging pragmatic functions. The study's finding concludes that the English graduate program tends to use writer-oriented hedges more, expressing the unwillingness of the writers to be seen entirely in their propositions. In contrast, the Indonesian graduate program tends to engage the readers by utilizing reader-oriented hedges more often than English graduate program students.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

37 penulis · 80 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Hasanuddin University
  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
SRI WAHYUNIHasanuddin University2
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lina ardiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Putri AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Putri Dea Ayu MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Warsono -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dery Tria AgustinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Puspa WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ika MirantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Retno ApriliyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanhan LovihandrieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Debby MulyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ari Putri HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aniq MukhoyyarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Destra Wibowo KusumoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rina BudiningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Retno Dwi FajriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fathiya Putri HandiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur AsriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Billy Ardy DwiwiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rinasa Intan CitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suwandi SuwandiState University of Semarang1
Amida FadwatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jed/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Comparative Study of Hedges in Theses’ Abstracts Written by English and Indonesian Graduate Programs of Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Chafidha, Laily Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Hedges, to be softened and weaken the claims, which avoid being blamed, and the claim can be accepted, play an essential role in presenting academic research in masters’ theses abstracts. This case study aimed to explain the comparison of hedges in the English and Indonesian graduate programs theses abstracts. The qualitative analysis was undertaken into five sub-research questions to find out the English department's hedges, the Indonesian department's hedges, the similarities and differences between both and its consequences. The analysis was employed based on the taxonomy of Hyland (1998) manually. The sample was thirty master’s thesis abstracts of graduate students from the English and Indonesian graduate programs Universitas Negeri Semarang, published from 2018 to 2022 and accessed through an online library. The finding reveals that hedging functions such as writer-oriented hedges, accuracy-oriented hedges, and reader-oriented hedges are realized in English, and Indonesian thesis abstracts are mostly similar. Besides, the analysis finds some differences. One of them is the similar term employed to reach different hedging pragmatic functions. The study's finding concludes that the English graduate program tends to use writer-oriented hedges more, expressing the unwillingness of the writers to be seen entirely in their propositions. In contrast, the Indonesian graduate program tends to engage the readers by utilizing reader-oriented hedges more often than English graduate program students.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-12-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jed/article/view/64412</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jed.v9i2.64412</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">The Journal of Educational Development; Vol 9 No 2 (2021): December 2021; 91-100</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4469</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2085-4943</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jed.v9i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jed/article/view/64412/24038</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 The Journal of Educational Development</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>