Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

the Developing Assessment Instrument In Critical Thinking Ability For Fifth Grade Of Elementary School In Thematic Learning

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019) · hlm. 123–132

DOI
10.15294/jere.v8i2.36685
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Terbit
2019-08-23
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The background of this study is about the availibility of the test assessment instrument to measure the critical thinking ability of fifth grade elementary school students which is limitted. Therefore, it needs to be developed. This development research used the Borg & Gall development method. The purpose of this study was to develop an assessment instrument in essay. The assessment instrument was validated by 5 Experts Judgment by using the Aiken'V formula. The results of trials using the construct validity of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), interater reliability used Two Ways Anova proved by the Ebel formula and internal consistent reliability with the Alpha Cronbach formula. The result of expert judgment validation showed that ≥0.8 which mean that 10 items were in valid category, construct validity results from large-scale test analysis by using LISREL 8.8 namely Confirmatory Factor fulfilled the testing of goodness of fit GFI value 0,93, CFI=0,97 and NFI=0,91. The three assessment criteria have value > 0,90. It can be concluded that the construct validity is met. The construct validity is also evidenced by the loading factor of 10 items. All of which have a price of > 0,3. The interrater reliability assessment instruments based on Expert Judgment coefficient value was 0,62. The expert agreement indicated that the rating given by each rater is reliable or consistent between one another and internal consistency of small scale test results of coefficient value of alpha 0,861, large scale 0.813. Practicality of assessment instruments based on expert judgment had mean 37.2 and included in practical category. The profile of critical thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students category “Medium”. The Conclusions was the assessment instruments in critical thinking skills of fifth grade students on thematic learning were tested in validity, reliability and suitable to be used.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 148 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 12 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • The University of Queensland
  • Muria Kudus University
  • IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang7
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang7
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang7
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang7
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang6
Bambang SubaliState University of Semarang5
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang4
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang4
Rochmad RochmadState University of Semarang3
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang3
. SupriyadiThe University of Queensland3
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sarwi SarwiState University of Semarang3
Bambang SubaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ridho Adi NegoroState University of Semarang3
Muhammad KhumaediState University of Semarang3
Supriyadi SupriyadiState University of Semarang3
Khaerunisak KhaerunisakAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Isti HidayahState University of Semarang2
Ahmad Yusril FahmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang2
Andi Saparuddin NurState University of Semarang2
S. SulhadiState University of Semarang2
Fina FakhriyahMuria Kudus University2
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang2
KhumaediState University of Semarang2
Budi AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suraji SurajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Roudloh Muna LiaState University of Semarang2
Sugianto SugiantoIAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon2
Teguh DarsonoState University of Semarang2
R SusantiState University of Semarang2
Sugiyanto SugiyantoState University of Semarang2
Sugianto SugiantoState University of Semarang2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiState University of Semarang2
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang2
Sulhadi SulhadiState University of Semarang2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">the Developing Assessment Instrument In Critical Thinking Ability For Fifth Grade Of Elementary School In Thematic Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hartanto, Hartanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rusilowati, Ani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kartono, Kartono</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The background of this study is about the availibility of the test assessment instrument to measure the critical thinking ability of fifth grade elementary school students which is limitted. Therefore, it needs to be developed. This development research used the Borg &amp;amp; Gall development method. The purpose of this study was to develop an assessment instrument in essay. The assessment instrument was validated by 5 Experts Judgment by using the Aiken'V formula. The results of trials using the construct validity of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), interater reliability used Two Ways Anova proved by the Ebel formula and internal consistent reliability with the Alpha Cronbach formula. The result of expert judgment validation showed that ≥0.8 which mean that 10 items were in valid category, construct validity results from large-scale test analysis by using LISREL 8.8 namely Confirmatory Factor fulfilled the testing of goodness of fit GFI value 0,93, CFI=0,97 and NFI=0,91. The three assessment criteria have value &amp;gt; 0,90. It can be concluded that the construct validity is met. The construct validity is also evidenced by the loading factor of 10 items. All of which have a price of &amp;gt; 0,3. The interrater reliability assessment instruments based on Expert Judgment coefficient value was 0,62. The expert agreement indicated that the rating given by each rater is reliable or consistent between one another and internal consistency of small scale test results of coefficient value of alpha 0,861, large scale 0.813. Practicality of assessment instruments based on expert judgment had mean 37.2 and included in practical category. The profile of critical thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students category “Medium”. The Conclusions was the assessment instruments in critical thinking skills of fifth grade students on thematic learning were tested in validity, reliability and suitable to be used.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-08-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/36685</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jere.v8i2.36685</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 8 No 2 (2019); 123-132</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jere.v8i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/36685/15165</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>