Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Teacher Evaluation in Determining Ability Minimum Completeness Criteria Subject First High School Mathematics

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019) · hlm. 133–140

DOI
10.15294/jere.v8i2.38022
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Terbit
2019-08-23
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

KKM determines a measurement of the quality of learning in the educational unit. Carrying capacity, intake, students, and teachers use the complexity of determining the subjects of mathematics so KKM in education units can be different. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of teachers to include suitability procedures, enabling and inhibiting factors as well as the enforceability of the process in determining the KKM. The study used a survey method. CIPP evaluation model using the model. The sampling technique using techniques Slovin. The subjects are mathematics teachers of junior high school in Cirebon. Content validity of the instrument based on the judgment of experts using a formula Aiken's V and reliability testing using the formula Ebel. Content validity was tested by three experts. Data is collected using interview techniques, documentation, and questionnaires. Data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The ability of teachers by 83% with a very high category. Suitability procedures by 85% with a very high category and is not by following under accordance with the procedures as much as 15% lower categories. Supporting factor of 92% with a very high category and a limiting factor of 8% with the lower categories. The supporting factors include improvements to the learning process with the fulfillment of infrastructure, making document 1, 2 and 3, the achievement of KKM conducted jointly, their results are difficult KD analysis, moderate or easy, proactive learners, participating in learning activities and tasks that have been designed educators, KD producing appropriate evaluation questions. Inhibiting factors there is no standard minimum completeness criteria format that is produced through MGMP. Implementation process by 79% with a very high category.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 155 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 14 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • The University of Queensland
  • Muria Kudus University
  • IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang7
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang7
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang7
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang6
Bambang SubaliState University of Semarang5
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang4
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang4
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang4
Suraji SurajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang3
. SupriyadiThe University of Queensland3
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sarwi SarwiState University of Semarang3
Bambang SubaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Samsudin AnisState University of Semarang3
Ridho Adi NegoroState University of Semarang3
Roudloh Muna LiaState University of Semarang3
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang3
Kartono KartonoState University of Semarang3
S. SulhadiState University of Semarang2
Fina FakhriyahMuria Kudus University2
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang2
KhumaediState University of Semarang2
Budi AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Supriyadi SupriyadiState University of Semarang2
Sugianto SugiantoIAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon2
Teguh DarsonoState University of Semarang2
KriswantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
R SusantiState University of Semarang2
Sugiyanto SugiyantoState University of Semarang2
Sugianto SugiantoState University of Semarang2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiState University of Semarang2
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Nathan HindartoState University of Semarang2
Suharto LinuwihState University of Semarang2
Suharto LinuwihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yeri SutopoState University of Semarang2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Teacher Evaluation in Determining Ability Minimum Completeness Criteria Subject First High School Mathematics</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Subekti, Estu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rusilowati, Ani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Khumaedi, M.</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">KKM determines a measurement of the quality of learning in the educational unit. Carrying capacity, intake, students, and teachers use the complexity of determining the subjects of mathematics so KKM in education units can be different. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of teachers to include suitability procedures, enabling and inhibiting factors as well as the enforceability of the process in determining the KKM. The study used a survey method. CIPP evaluation model using the model. The sampling technique using techniques Slovin. The subjects are mathematics teachers of junior high school in Cirebon. Content validity of the instrument based on the judgment of experts using a formula Aiken's V and reliability testing using the formula Ebel. Content validity was tested by three experts. Data is collected using interview techniques, documentation, and questionnaires. Data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The ability of teachers by 83% with a very high category. Suitability procedures by 85% with a very high category and is not by following under accordance with the procedures as much as 15% lower categories. Supporting factor of 92% with a very high category and a limiting factor of 8% with the lower categories. The supporting factors include improvements to the learning process with the fulfillment of infrastructure, making document 1, 2 and 3, the achievement of KKM conducted jointly, their results are difficult KD analysis, moderate or easy, proactive learners, participating in learning activities and tasks that have been designed educators, KD producing appropriate evaluation questions. Inhibiting factors there is no standard minimum completeness criteria format that is produced through MGMP. Implementation process by 79% with a very high category.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-08-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/38022</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jere.v8i2.38022</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 8 No 2 (2019); 133-140</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jere.v8i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/38022/15617</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>