Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Analysis of Problem Solving on IDEAL Problem Solving Learning Based on Van Hiele Theory Assisted by Geogebra on Geometry

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020) · hlm. 170–178

ISSN
2502-4507, 2252-6455
Terbit
2020-12-23
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The objectives of this study are to analyze the effectiveness of the learning of IDEAL Problem Solving models based on Van Hiele theory assisted by Geogebra software and to describe students’ problem solving ability at each level of geometrical thinking. This research was a type of qualitative and quantitative combination research. The combination model of this study was the type of concurrent triangulation, the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in a balanced way. Quantitative research sampling technique was simple random sampling in which this study was taken in one experimental class and one control class. The technique of selecting qualitative research subjects was non-probability sampling, where the taking of subjects was based on the level of geometrical thinking. The conclusions are obtained (1) IDEAL Problem solving models Learning based on van Hiele theory assisted by Geogebra software is effective on students' problem solving ability. (2) The problem solving ability of each level of Van Hiele's geometry thinking is that students at level 1 (analysis), they can understand the problem but cannot plan their solution well. Level 2 students (informal deduction), they can understand problems, plan, implement plans well, but they cannot check results. Level 3 (deduction), the students can understand problems, plan, implement plans, and check results well.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 153 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 4 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga8
Mulyono MulyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Putriaji HendikawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Sugiman SugimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
St. Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang4
Isnarto IsnartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mohammad AsikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwijanto DwijantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Farida NursyahidahState University of Semarang2
Kristina WijayantiState University of Semarang2
Arief AgoestantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang2
Yuninda Diah PratiwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Endang SetyowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Prihatina HikmasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
YL SukestiyarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Kristina WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
WardonoState University of Semarang1
Wardono WardonoState University of Semarang1
Emi PujiastutiState University of Semarang1
Stevanus Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sumliyah SumliyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nyree AniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Y L SukestiyarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali AlfatahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhamad Irwan HaqiqiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Agung FitriantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yenrika Kurniati RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mikke Novia IndrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Onwardono Rit RiyantoIAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon1
Dian BayujagaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri Ady AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Imanuel ImanuelAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Indah Ratri RatnasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analysis of Problem Solving on IDEAL Problem Solving Learning Based on Van Hiele Theory Assisted by Geogebra on Geometry</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Abduh, M. Faisal</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Waluya, S. B.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mariani, Scolastika</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The objectives of this study are to analyze the effectiveness of the learning of IDEAL Problem Solving models based on Van Hiele theory assisted by Geogebra software and to describe students’ problem solving ability at each level of geometrical thinking. This research was a type of qualitative and quantitative combination research. The combination model of this study was the type of concurrent triangulation, the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in a balanced way. Quantitative research sampling technique was simple random sampling in which this study was taken in one experimental class and one control class. The technique of selecting qualitative research subjects was non-probability sampling, where the taking of subjects was based on the level of geometrical thinking. The conclusions are obtained (1) IDEAL Problem solving models Learning based on van Hiele theory assisted by Geogebra software is effective on students' problem solving ability. (2) The problem solving ability of each level of Van Hiele's geometry thinking is that students at level 1 (analysis), they can understand the problem but cannot plan their solution well. Level 2 students (informal deduction), they can understand problems, plan, implement plans well, but they cannot check results. Level 3 (deduction), the students can understand problems, plan, implement plans, and check results well.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-12-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/33198</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research; Vol 9 No 2 (2020): December 2020; 170-178</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4507</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6455</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/33198/14011</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>