Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability in Terms of Students Learning Motivation in Probing Prompting Learning

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022) · pp. 183–190

DOI
10.15294/ujme.v11i2.59937
ISSN
2460-5840, 2252-6927
Published
2022-08-31
Publisher
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This research aimed (1) to analyze the effectiveness of Probing Prompting learning on students' mathematical critical thinking skills and (2) to describe mathematical critical thinking skills in terms of students' learning motivation in learning with the Probing Prompting model. This research method was a combination research method (mixed method) with the type of Explanatory Sequential Design. The results showed that: (1) the mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class achieved classical completeness; (2) the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Probing Prompting class is more than the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Problem Based Learning class; (3) the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class is more than the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Problem Based Learning class. Subjects with high learning motivation are able to meet all indicators of mathematical critical thinking skills, namely indicators of clarification, assessment, inference, and strategies. Subjects with moderate learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the clarification indicators; less able to meet the assessment indicators; tend to be able to meet the inference indicators; and able to meet the indicators of strategies. Subjects with low learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the indicators of clarification, less able to meet the assessment indicators, less able to meet the inference indicators, and tend to be able to meet the indicators of strategies.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 121 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Rahayu Budhiati VeronicaAffiliation unknown6
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga4
Isnarto IsnartoAffiliation unknown3
Emi PujiastutiState University of Semarang3
Mashuri MashuriAffiliation unknown3
Isti HidayahAffiliation unknown2
St. Budi WaluyaAffiliation unknown2
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang2
Y L SukestiyarnoAffiliation unknown1
Intan WahyuningsihAffiliation unknown1
Kholipah TunisaAffiliation unknown1
Andi WibowoAffiliation unknown1
Najmah Fithria QothrunnadaAffiliation unknown1
Zaenuri MasturAffiliation unknown1
Fenti NugraheniAffiliation unknown1
Ema KhoerunnisaAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Abdul AzizAffiliation unknown1
Rochmad RochmadAffiliation unknown1
Nila Kumoro ManahAffiliation unknown1
PRIMA SEKAR WIDYANINGRUMAffiliation unknown1
Aizzatun NikmahAffiliation unknown1
Endang Retno WinartiAffiliation unknown1
Novia Wulan DaryAffiliation unknown1
Siti Aminah SilvianiAffiliation unknown1
Safana Aulia FazaAffiliation unknown1
ZaenuriAffiliation unknown1
Arum DinasariAffiliation unknown1
Ikvina Dhyah RatnawatiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Nur ChalimAffiliation unknown1
Dwijanto DwijantoAffiliation unknown1
Linda Ajeng PratiwiAffiliation unknown1
Rini WulandariAffiliation unknown1
Tintrim Sri RejekiAffiliation unknown1
Siti Jami’atunAffiliation unknown1
Nuriana Rachmani DewiAffiliation unknown1
Yasin PrasetiaAffiliation unknown1
Amaliyatul MahfiyahAffiliation unknown1
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujme/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability in Terms of Students Learning Motivation in Probing Prompting Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Dewi, Oktriviani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wijayanti, Kristina</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This research aimed (1) to analyze the effectiveness of Probing Prompting learning on students' mathematical critical thinking skills and (2) to describe mathematical critical thinking skills in terms of students' learning motivation in learning with the Probing Prompting model. This research method was a combination research method (mixed method) with the type of Explanatory Sequential Design. The results showed that: (1) the mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class achieved classical completeness; (2) the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Probing Prompting class is more than the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Problem Based Learning class; (3) the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class is more than the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Problem Based Learning class. Subjects with high learning motivation are able to meet all indicators of mathematical critical thinking skills, namely indicators of clarification, assessment, inference, and strategies. Subjects with moderate learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the clarification indicators; less able to meet the assessment indicators; tend to be able to meet the inference indicators; and able to meet the indicators of strategies. Subjects with low learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the indicators of clarification, less able to meet the assessment indicators, less able to meet the inference indicators, and tend to be able to meet the indicators of strategies. &amp;nbsp;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-08-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/59937</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ujme.v11i2.59937</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; 183-190</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-5840</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6927</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ujme.v11i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/59937/22575</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>