Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY BASED ON TEACHING MODELS INTERVENTION AND COGNITIVE STYLE

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020) · hlm. 209–222

DOI
10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Terbit
2020-04-06
Penerbit
Indonesian Mathematical Society
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The study aimed to analyze the interaction effect teaching models and cognitive style field dependent (FD)-field independent (FI) to students’ mathematical problem-solving ability (MPSA), as well as students' MPSA differences based on teaching models and cognitive styles. Participants in this study were 145 junior high school students, with details of 50 students learning through the Connect, Organize, Reflect, and Extend Realistic Mathematics Education (CORE RME) model, 49 students use the CORE model, and 46 students use the Conventional model. Data collection tools used are the MPSA test, and the group embedded figure test (GEFT). The MPSA test finds out that there are interaction effect teaching models and cognitive styles on students' MPSA, as well as a significant difference in MPSA students who study through the CORE RME model, CORE model, and Conventional model. Based on cognitive style, between students who study through CORE RME model, CORE model, and Conventional model found that there was no significant difference in MPSA between FI students. Furthermore, there were significant differences in MPSA between FD students and also MPSA of FI students better than MPSA FD students. Therefore, teaching models and student cognitive styles are very important to be considered in the learning process, so students are able to solve mathematical problems.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 106 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 43 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero
  • IKIP Siliwangi
  • University of Timor
  • Lambung Mangkurat University
  • State University of Semarang
  • State University of Medan
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dadang JuandiIndonesia University of Education3
Yaya Sukjaya KusumahIndonesia University of Education2
Delsika Pramata SariLambung Mangkurat University2
Tatang HermanIndonesia University of Education2
Didi SuryadiIndonesia University of Education2
Javier García‐GarcíaUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero2
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang2
Sufyani PrabawantoIndonesia University of Education2
Adi NurjamanIndonesia University of Education1
Edi SupriyadiIndonesia University of Education1
Wahyu HidayatIKIP Siliwangi1
Jozua SabandarIndonesia University of Education1
Edy SuryaState University of Medan1
Zulkardi ZulkardiSriwijaya University1
Bonita HirzaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Palembang1
Damianus Dao SamoUniversity of Nusa Cendana1
Bana G. KartasasmitaIndonesia University of Education1
Rizky RosjanuardiIndonesia University of Education1
Turmudi TurmudiIndonesia University of Education1
Widya KusumaningsihUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
Nelly FitrianiIKIP Siliwangi1
Ika MeikaUniversitas Mathla'ul Anwar Banten1
Camilo Andrés Rodríguez-NietoUniversidad de la Costa1
Sudirman SudirmanIndonesia Open University1
Gida KadarismaIKIP Siliwangi1
Gerardo Salgado-BeltránUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero1
Elizabeth Santos-CasildoUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero1
Elah NurlaelahIndonesia University of Education1
Dini AndianiUniversitas Bale Bandung1
Sufyani PrabawantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Khairunnisa KhairunnisaIndonesia University of Education1
Qania Agustika SiagianAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Qania Agustika SiagianIndonesia University of Education1
Endang Cahya Mulyaning AsihIndonesia University of Education1
Gusni SatriawatiIndonesia University of Education1
Bambang Avip Priatna MartadiputraIndonesia University of Education1
Mujiyono WiryotinoyoUniversitas Jambi1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY BASED ON TEACHING MODELS INTERVENTION AND COGNITIVE STYLE</dc:title><dc:creator>Son, Aloisius Loka</dc:creator><dc:creator>Darhim, Darhim</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fatimah, Siti</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The study aimed to analyze the interaction effect teaching models and cognitive style field dependent (FD)-field independent (FI) to students’ mathematical problem-solving ability (MPSA), as well as students' MPSA differences based on teaching models and cognitive styles. Participants in this study were 145 junior high school students, with details of 50 students learning through the Connect, Organize, Reflect, and Extend Realistic Mathematics Education (CORE RME) model, 49 students use the CORE model, and 46 students use the Conventional model. Data collection tools used are the MPSA test, and the group embedded figure test (GEFT). The MPSA test finds out that there are interaction effect teaching models and cognitive styles on students' MPSA, as well as a significant difference in MPSA students who study through the CORE RME model, CORE model, and Conventional model. Based on cognitive style, between students who study through CORE RME model, CORE model, and Conventional model found that there was no significant difference in MPSA between FI students. Furthermore, there were significant differences in MPSA between FD students and also MPSA of FI students better than MPSA FD students. Therefore, teaching models and student cognitive styles are very important to be considered in the learning process, so students are able to solve mathematical problems.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2020-04-06</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 11 No 2 (2020); 209-222</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/viewFile/10744/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>