Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023) · hlm. 207–226

DOI
10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Terbit
2023-11-04
Penerbit
Indonesian Mathematical Society
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 126 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 47 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • IKIP Siliwangi
  • State University of Medan
  • Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
  • Satya Wacana Christian University
  • Gunma University
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sufyani PrabawantoIndonesia University of Education6
Tatang HermanIndonesia University of Education6
Jarnawi Afgani DahlanIndonesia University of Education4
Turmudi TurmudiIndonesia University of Education3
Al JupriIndonesia University of Education3
Dilham FardianIndonesia University of Education2
Darhim DarhimIndonesia University of Education2
Lina NurhayatiIndonesia University of Education2
Tri Nova Hasti YuniantaSatya Wacana Christian University2
Wahyudin WahyudinTadulako University2
Lukman LukmanIndonesia University of Education2
E. Elvis NapitupuluState University of Medan1
Yaya Sukjaya KusumahIndonesia University of Education1
Abdul FatahSultan Ageng Tirtayasa University1
Jozua SabandarIndonesia University of Education1
Isnarto -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Takashi ItohGunma University1
Nadya Syifa UtamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dadang JuandiIndonesia University of Education1
Agus HendriyantoIndonesia University of Education1
Riyan HidayatUniversiti Putra Malaysia1
Yousef WardatHigher Colleges of Technology1
Sani SaharaIndonesia University of Education1
Lukman Hakim MuhaiminIndonesia University of Education1
Krida Singgih KuncoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wilda Syam TonraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endang Cahya MulyaningAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
KusnandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nyiayu Fahriza FuadiahUniversitas PGRI Palembang1
Nelly FitrianiIKIP Siliwangi1
Muhammad Win AfganiUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang1
Ika MeikaUniversitas Mathla'ul Anwar Banten1
Edi SupriyadiIndonesia University of Education1
Indah Puspita SariIKIP Siliwangi1
Mohamad Gilar JatisundaUniversitas Majalengka1
Uba UmbaraUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kuningan1
Talisadika S. MaifaIndonesia University of Education1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level</dc:title><dc:creator>Sari, Atika Defita</dc:creator><dc:creator>Suryadi, Didi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dasari, Dadan</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-11-04</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 15 No 1 (2023); 207-226</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>http://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/download/510/113</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>