Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

How do Indonesian students learn function concepts? A praxeological analysis of textbook

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024) · hlm. 451–472

DOI
10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp451-472
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Terbit
2024-03-06
Penerbit
Indonesian Mathematical Society
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The conception of functions, defined as the relationship between magnitudes or sets of ordered pairs, varies among students depending on the contextualization of the concept within the curriculum, notably in school textbooks. This investigation endeavors to scrutinize the approach taken by Indonesian textbooks in introducing the function concept at the lower secondary school level. An eighth-grade mathematics textbook was scrutinized utilizing praxeology, the fundamental construct of the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. The analytical process unfolded in three main phases: examination of the praxis block, analysis of the logos block, and evaluation of the textbook's praxeological structure in collaboration with experts and educators. The examination revealed that the Indonesian textbook organizes functions into three distinct local praxeological frameworks: functions as sets, bijective functions, and functions as relationships between magnitudes. The praxis primarily emphasizes tasks and techniques for functions formulated by sets, shaping the landscape of function learning in Indonesia. Consequently, a notable epistemological gap within logos stems from the disparity between two conceptions of functions: functions as sets and analytical expressions. These findings underscore the necessity for an alternative praxeological arrangement of functions, mainly to bridge the divide between the set-theoretical definition and the analytical expression of a function.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 125 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 46 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • IKIP Siliwangi
  • Tadulako University
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Kuningan
  • Universitas Majalengka
  • State University of Medan
  • Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dadan DasariIndonesia University of Education5
Jarnawi Afgani DahlanIndonesia University of Education4
Wahyudin WahyudinTadulako University4
Uba UmbaraUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kuningan4
Al JupriIndonesia University of Education4
Dilham FardianIndonesia University of Education4
Tatang HermanIndonesia University of Education3
Mohamad Gilar JatisundaUniversitas Majalengka3
Turmudi TurmudiIndonesia University of Education2
Darhim DarhimIndonesia University of Education2
E. Elvis NapitupuluState University of Medan1
Yaya Sukjaya KusumahIndonesia University of Education1
Abdul FatahSultan Ageng Tirtayasa University1
Jozua SabandarIndonesia University of Education1
Wahyu HidayatIKIP Siliwangi1
Lina NurhayatiIndonesia University of Education1
Tri Nova Hasti YuniantaSatya Wacana Christian University1
Isnarto -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Takashi ItohGunma University1
Atika Defita SariIndonesia University of Education1
Dadang JuandiIndonesia University of Education1
Agus HendriyantoIndonesia University of Education1
Riyan HidayatUniversiti Putra Malaysia1
Yousef WardatHigher Colleges of Technology1
Sani SaharaIndonesia University of Education1
Lukman Hakim MuhaiminIndonesia University of Education1
Krida Singgih KuncoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wilda Syam TonraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endang Cahya MulyaningAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
KusnandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizky RosjanuardiIndonesia University of Education1
Edi IrawanUniversitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo1
Nanang PriatnaIndonesia University of Education1
HerizalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nyiayu Fahriza FuadiahUniversitas PGRI Palembang1
Nelly FitrianiIKIP Siliwangi1
Dian CahyawatiSriwijaya University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>How do Indonesian students learn function concepts? A praxeological analysis of textbook</dc:title><dc:creator>Utami, Nadya Syifa</dc:creator><dc:creator>Prabawanto, Sufyani</dc:creator><dc:creator>Suryadi, Didi</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The conception of functions, defined as the relationship between magnitudes or sets of ordered pairs, varies among students depending on the contextualization of the concept within the curriculum, notably in school textbooks. This investigation endeavors to scrutinize the approach taken by Indonesian textbooks in introducing the function concept at the lower secondary school level. An eighth-grade mathematics textbook was scrutinized utilizing praxeology, the fundamental construct of the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. The analytical process unfolded in three main phases: examination of the praxis block, analysis of the logos block, and evaluation of the textbook's praxeological structure in collaboration with experts and educators. The examination revealed that the Indonesian textbook organizes functions into three distinct local praxeological frameworks: functions as sets, bijective functions, and functions as relationships between magnitudes. The praxis primarily emphasizes tasks and techniques for functions formulated by sets, shaping the landscape of function learning in Indonesia. Consequently, a notable epistemological gap within logos stems from the disparity between two conceptions of functions: functions as sets and analytical expressions. These findings underscore the necessity for an alternative praxeological arrangement of functions, mainly to bridge the divide between the set-theoretical definition and the analytical expression of a function.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-03-06</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp451-472</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp451-472</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 15 No 2 (2024); 451-472</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>http://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/download/502/133</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>