Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

THE LATERAL THINKING PROCESSES IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL WORD PROBLEMS REVIEWED AT ADVERSITY QUOTIENT AND REFLECTIVE COGNITIVE STYLE

Infinity Journal · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022)

DOI
10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p223-236
ISSN
2460-9285, 2089-6867
Terbit
2022-09-20
Penerbit
IKIP Siliwangi Bandung
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Solving word problems with a thought jump shows flexibility and the ability to use alternative procedures that are important for students to master. The thought jump is a feature of the lateral thinking process and is needed to overcome the various difficulties in solving mathematical word problems. However, lateral thinking has not been widely linked with adversity quotient and reflective cognitive style. This study aimed to describe students' lateral thinking processes in solving word problems in terms of adversity quotient and reflective cognitive style. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The subjects in this study were junior high school students in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi Province. The research instrument used the MFFT diagnostic test, ARP questionnaire sheet, word problem text, and interview guidelines. The results of this study indicate that climber-reflective subjects can think laterally and use them to solve the first and second-word problems well. Camper-reflective subjects can only think laterally for situations that are still within reach, while for more complicated cases, camper subjects are easily distracted and even stop solving problems. Quitter subjects solve word problems very procedurally, follow rigid algorithms, and cannot work backward when faced with difficulties.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 104 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 14 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • University of Miyazaki
  • State University of Malang
  • VIA University College
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Fathur RokhmanState University of Semarang5
Walid WalidState University of Semarang4
Heri YantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Gunawan TjokroAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Abdul RajagukgukAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Iwan JunaediState University of Semarang3
Iqbal KharisudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Khaerunisak KhaerunisakAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Isti HidayahState University of Semarang2
Ahmad Yusril FahmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Subhan SubhanState University of Semarang2
Dwi ArifaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga2
Mulyono MulyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Heriyanto HeriyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang2
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang2
Nuriana Rachmani DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rohimatul AzizahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang1
Daiki NakamuraUniversity of Miyazaki1
Sudarmin SudarminState University of Semarang1
Yudhi UtomoState University of Malang1
E. JuulVIA University College1
Arief RohmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad KhafidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Souad EzzeroualiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tajudeen SanniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur WakhidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang1
Maria Herliyani Dua BungaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Desi SetiyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Devi PurwantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohammad AsikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ginanjar MaulanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adhi SusantoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2460-9285/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 1 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>THE LATERAL THINKING PROCESSES IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL WORD PROBLEMS REVIEWED  AT ADVERSITY QUOTIENT AND REFLECTIVE COGNITIVE STYLE</dc:title><dc:creator>Nur, Andi Saparuddin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kartono, Kartono</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zaenuri, Zaenuri</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rochmad, Rochmad</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Solving word problems with a thought jump shows flexibility and the ability to use alternative procedures that are important for students to master. The thought jump is a feature of the lateral thinking process and is needed to overcome the various difficulties in solving mathematical word problems. However, lateral thinking has not been widely linked with adversity quotient and reflective cognitive style. This study aimed to describe students' lateral thinking processes in solving word problems in terms of adversity quotient and reflective cognitive style. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The subjects in this study were junior high school students in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi Province. The research instrument used the MFFT diagnostic test, ARP questionnaire sheet, word problem text, and interview guidelines. The results of this study indicate that climber-reflective subjects can think laterally and use them to solve the first and second-word problems well. Camper-reflective subjects can only think laterally for situations that are still within reach, while for more complicated cases, camper subjects are easily distracted and even stop solving problems. Quitter subjects solve word problems very procedurally, follow rigid algorithms, and cannot work backward when faced with difficulties.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>IKIP Siliwangi Bandung</dc:publisher><dc:date>2022-09-20</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p223-236</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p223-236</dc:identifier><dc:source>Infinity Journal; Vol 11 No 2 (2022); 223</dc:source><dc:source>2460-9285</dc:source><dc:source>2089-6867</dc:source><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>