Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Effectiveness of Whole Brain Teaching and Reciprocal Teaching in Reading to Visual and Auditory Students

English Education Journal · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2018) · hlm. 186–194

DOI
10.15294/eej.v8i3.21711
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2018-02-21
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aimed analyzing the effectiveness of Whole Brain Teaching and Reciprocal Teaching to teach reading comprehension to visual and auditory students in MTs Qodiriyah. The subject of this research was eight graders. Class VIII A was as the experiment class 1 and class VIII C was as experiment class two. Every class consisted of 30 students (15 visuals and 15 auditory). This study was experimental research design by using 2x2 factorial designs. The data collection was done by giving visual auditory kinaesthetic (VAK) and reading comprehension tests. The data was analyzed by using t-test and ANOVA. The study revealed results that Whole Brain Teaching and Reciprocal Teaching were effective to teach reading comprehension to visual and auditory students. Reciprocal Teaching gave better effect than Whole Brain Teaching in teaching reading comprehension to both visual and auditory students. The last, there was no interaction between teaching techniques, students’ reading comprehension, and learning styles. In conclusion, both Whole Brain Teaching and Reciprocal Teaching were effective applied in teaching reading comprehension to visual and auditory students. Although there was no interaction between three variables, the fact showed students’ reading comprehension achievement was influenced by the teaching techniques not the students’ learning styles

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 150 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui14
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui13
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Putri AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lina ardiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Putri Dea Ayu MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh. Ilhami HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi AngganiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daniela Elivas HastunarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Warsono -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dery Tria AgustinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bambang Ruby SugiartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Puspa WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendro KuncoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ika MirantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Ari SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agnes Arum BudianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effectiveness of Whole Brain Teaching and Reciprocal Teaching in Reading to Visual and Auditory Students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Lahita, Nanda</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sutopo, Djoko</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aimed analyzing the effectiveness of Whole Brain Teaching and Reciprocal Teaching to teach reading comprehension to visual and auditory students in MTs Qodiriyah. The subject of this research was eight graders. Class VIII A was as the experiment class 1 and class VIII C was as experiment class two. Every class consisted of 30 students (15 visuals and 15 auditory). This study was experimental research design by using 2x2 factorial designs. The data collection was done by giving visual auditory kinaesthetic (VAK) and reading comprehension tests. The data was analyzed by using t-test and ANOVA. The study revealed results that Whole Brain Teaching and Reciprocal Teaching were effective to teach reading comprehension to visual and auditory students. Reciprocal Teaching gave better effect than Whole Brain Teaching in teaching reading comprehension to both visual and auditory students. The last, there was no interaction between teaching techniques, students’ reading comprehension, and learning styles. In conclusion, both Whole Brain Teaching and Reciprocal Teaching were effective applied in teaching reading comprehension to visual and auditory students. Although there was no interaction between three variables, the fact showed students’ reading comprehension achievement was influenced by the teaching techniques not the students’ learning styles</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-02-21</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/21711</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v8i3.21711</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 8 No 2 (2018): June 2018; 186-194</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v8i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/21711/10355</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>