Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Teachers’questioning Strategies to Scaffold Students’ Learning in Reading

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019) · hlm. 128–143

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i1.28110
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2019-01-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The objectives of this study are to analyze the type of teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning in reading, to analyze the students’ responses to answer the teachers’ questions, to analyze teachers’ questioning strategies in order to explain how the questions scaffold students’ learning in reading. The instruments used are classrooms observasion, teachers’ interviews, and document analysis. This study uses descriptive qualitative approach: a case study in Nasima Junior High School by means of questioning strategies proposed by Wragg and Brown (2001). The data are taken from classroom interaction of three teachers and sixty two students in three classes in nine meetings.The study shows that the teachers used all variant of key tactic questions. The most frequent strategy is listening to replies and responding tactic. In the term of students’ responses, the mostly response is active response in pure English. In the case of teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning reading, structuring, pitching and putting clearly, and directing and distributing tactic frequently perfome in before reading activities. During reading activities, the teachers performe all variant of key tactic question to scaffold the students, exceptly pacing tactic was never applied. In after reading activities, teachers mostly play sequencing tactic and pitching and putting clearly tactic to scaffold students’ learning reading.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 151 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 10 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Islamic University of Riau
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Hamdani M. SyamUniversitas Syiah Kuala4
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rizanna RosemaryUniversitas Syiah Kuala2
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rahmat SalehUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Abdul Rani UsmanUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
Dini KhairaniUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Deni YanuarUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Heru Syah PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Erman AnomUniversitas Esa Unggul1
Dafrizal SamsudinIslamic University of Riau1
Alber Tigor ArifyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fransiska Tatto Dua LembangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rolan RolanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zumala HusnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini Susanti WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anindya PangestikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaely HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Teachers’questioning Strategies to Scaffold Students’ Learning in Reading</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Anisah, Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wuli Fitriati, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The objectives of this study are to analyze the type of teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning in reading, to analyze the students’ responses to answer the teachers’ questions, to analyze teachers’ questioning strategies in order to explain how the questions scaffold students’ learning in reading. The instruments used are classrooms observasion, teachers’ interviews, and document analysis. This study uses descriptive qualitative approach: a case study in Nasima Junior High School by means of questioning strategies proposed by Wragg and Brown (2001). The data are taken from classroom interaction of three teachers and sixty two students in three classes in nine meetings.The study shows that the teachers used all variant of key tactic questions.&amp;nbsp; The most frequent strategy is&amp;nbsp; listening to replies and responding tactic. In the term of students’ responses, the mostly response is active response in pure English. In the case of teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning reading, structuring, pitching and putting clearly, and directing and distributing tactic frequently perfome in before reading activities. During reading activities, the teachers performe all variant of key tactic question to scaffold the students, exceptly pacing tactic was never applied. In after reading activities, teachers mostly play sequencing tactic and pitching and putting clearly tactic to scaffold students’ learning reading.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-01-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/28110</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i1.28110</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 1 (2019): March 2019; 128-143</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/28110/12347</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>