Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Comparison of Conversational Structures between Zach Sang and The Radio 1 Breakfast Shows

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 3 (2019) · hlm. 421–427

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i3.31766
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2019-07-25
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study focused on a comparison of conversational structures between two talk shows, Zach Sang Show and Radio 1 Breakfast Show. This study is a descriptive qualitative study. It used Zach Sang Show and Radio 1 Breakfast Show on an episode interview with Sam Smith as the object of the study. To analyze the data, the researcher used conversation analysis theory proposed by Schegloff and Sacks (1977). The result of the study revealed that both talk shows applied the structures of opening, closing, adjacency pairs, turn taking, and repairs. There are some similarities and differences between these two talk shows in terms of structures. High involvement style and high considerateness style appear in both shows. However, in Zach Sang Show, the two speakers mostly share the same style which is high considerateness style. In conclusion, there are some differences of conversational structures between Zach Sang Show and Radio 1 Breakfast Show on their interviews with Sam Smith. Keywords: Conversational Structures, Turn-Taking, Adjacency Pairs, Repairs, Conversation Style

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 163 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Putri AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh. Akhdan Aufarizal IrhamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Zaid MuttaqinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alief Noor FaridaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pasca KalisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lina ardiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisa Nur AtikahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SetiowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdrurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mokhammad Pradana AjiasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Banggala Puja SenaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Putri Dea Ayu MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gracendy Aluz Clarita BudionoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afief FakhruddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Comparison of Conversational Structures between Zach Sang and The Radio 1 Breakfast Shows</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Izza, Awwalia Fitrotin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yuliasri, Issy</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study focused on a comparison of conversational structures between two talk shows, Zach Sang Show and Radio 1 Breakfast Show. This study is a descriptive qualitative study. It used Zach Sang Show and Radio 1 Breakfast Show on an episode interview with Sam Smith as the object of the study. To analyze the data, the researcher used conversation analysis theory proposed by Schegloff and Sacks (1977). The result of the study revealed that both talk shows applied the structures of opening, closing, adjacency pairs, turn taking, and repairs. There are some similarities and differences between these two talk shows in terms of structures. High involvement style and high considerateness style appear in both shows. However, in Zach Sang Show, the two speakers mostly share the same style which is high considerateness style. In conclusion, there are some differences of conversational structures between Zach Sang Show and Radio 1 Breakfast Show on their interviews with Sam Smith.
Keywords: Conversational Structures, Turn-Taking, Adjacency Pairs, Repairs, Conversation Style</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/31766</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i3.31766</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 3 (2019): September 2019; 421-427</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/31766/13749</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>