Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Evaluation of Exercises Compatibility Between Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and 2013 Curriculum Reflected in English Textbook

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020) · hlm. 252–265

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.35742
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2020-06-20
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study was aimed to evaluate the English textbook which focused on exercises provided, entitled Bahasa Inggris Kelas X (2017). This research used descriptive evaluative study in which all exercises were analyzed toward Revised Bloom;s Taxonomy as well as 2013 Curriculum in order to see its compatibility. Besides, it also examined the compatibility of 2013 Curriculum toward Revised Bloom’s taxonomy.The results of the study showed that (1) The exercises found in Bahasa Inggris textbook were compatible toward Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Besides, the knowledge dimensions (factual, conceptual, procedural and metacognitive) were manifested in the exercises. (2) With regard to the compatibility of the exercises toward 2013 Curriculum, the exercises found in Bahasa Inggris textbook were compatible. The exercises were designed according to the Core Competence and Basic Competence mentioned in 2013 Curriculum as they were divided according to the chapter/topic they belong to. (3) In regard to the compatibility of 2013 Curriculum toward Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, the Core Competence and Basic Competence in 2013 Curriculum were well designed in line with the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. It was reflected in all basic competences that were hierachically put based on the taxonomy started from the lowest into the highest level. Furthermore, the learning activities found in 2013 Curriculum were done in Higher Order Thinking Skills. (4) Although the activities designed in the exercises are following Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Curriculum 2013, the material used were not too suitable with the need of vocational students in which they need more special need. The results of the study are expected to give a valuable contribution that the further study can extent the study to discuss about the quiz or test provided by school or institution to be examined toward the current curriculum and Bloom’s revised tanonomy as well as the students’ special needs in order to encourage the education practitioners to design good quiz or test for the students.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 145 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zulfa ShakiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Jumadi JumadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wahyu Nur HidayatPoliteknik Negeri Malang1
Rahmana Ilmi HakimUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ellvina Pramitadewi PramitadewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fauziyatur RohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aldhy Sigma Lintang PamungkasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Heri CahyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh. AsroriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dzulkifli AbdullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Banggala Puja SenaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prima PuspitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maria Fifi HermawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Warsono -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atiya Mahmud HanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arina YuliartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Evi FebrianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Trias SeptianingsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ulya RosyitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul KhalimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Evita Ardy PrabasiwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Riski SafitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Evaluation of Exercises Compatibility Between Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and 2013 Curriculum Reflected in English Textbook</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Susan, Susandari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Warsono, Warsono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study was aimed to evaluate the English textbook which focused on exercises provided, entitled Bahasa Inggris Kelas X (2017). This research used descriptive evaluative study in which all exercises were analyzed toward Revised Bloom;s Taxonomy as well as 2013 Curriculum in order to see its compatibility. Besides, it also examined the compatibility of 2013 Curriculum toward Revised Bloom’s taxonomy.The results of the study showed that (1) The exercises found in Bahasa Inggris textbook were compatible toward Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Besides, the knowledge dimensions (factual, conceptual, procedural and metacognitive) were manifested in the exercises. (2) With regard to the compatibility of the exercises toward 2013 Curriculum, the exercises found in Bahasa Inggris textbook were compatible. The exercises were designed according to the Core Competence and Basic Competence mentioned in 2013 Curriculum as they were divided according to the chapter/topic they belong to. (3) In regard to the compatibility of 2013 Curriculum toward Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy,&amp;nbsp; the Core Competence and Basic Competence in 2013 Curriculum were well designed in line with the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. It was reflected in all basic competences that were hierachically put based on the taxonomy started from the lowest into the highest level. Furthermore, the learning activities found in 2013 Curriculum were done in Higher Order Thinking Skills. (4) Although the activities designed in the exercises are following Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Curriculum 2013, the material used were not too suitable with the need of vocational students in which they need more special need. The results of the study are expected to give a valuable contribution that the further study can extent the study to discuss about the quiz or test provided by school or institution to be examined toward the current curriculum and Bloom’s revised tanonomy as well as the students’ special needs in order to encourage the education practitioners to design good quiz or test for the students.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/35742</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.35742</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 2 (2020): June 2020; 252-265</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/35742/14733</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>