Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The effectiveness of socrative and kahoot to teach grammar to students with different interest

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2020) · hlm. 366–373

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.36696
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2020-09-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aimed at examining the effectiveness of socrative and kahootto teach grammar to students with different interest. The objectives of the study are, to analyze high and low interest students’ score of grammar in order to explain the effectiveness of socrative, to analyze high and low interest students’ score of grammar in order to explain the effectiveness of kahoot, to analyze the significant difference between the students with high interest after taught by using Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar, to analyze the significant difference between the students with low interest after taught by using Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar, to analyze how the interaction is among teaching, students’ interest and grammar. It was an experimental research with 2x2 factorial design. I used questionnaire, observation and test. The data from questionnaire and grammar test is analyzed quantitatively using T-test and ANOVA.The results of this research showed that socrative to students with high and low interest (79.17 and 57.50) and kahoot to students with high and low interest (85.50 and 62.86) are effective. Mean score of kahoot multimedia was higher than socrative in teaching grammar. There was no significant interaction among multimedia, interest and students’ grammar achievement..

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 131 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zulfa ShakiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Banggala Puja SenaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prima PuspitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maria Fifi HermawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daniela Elivas HastunarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daning Desy ArtyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atikah WatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Warsono -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atiya Mahmud HanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Evi FebrianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ulya RosyitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Riski SafitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nova Rifqi FaristaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti MujahadahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Windhariyati Dyah KusumawantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ivvon Septina BellaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
abdulhakim faraj alowalidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
sigit sulistiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Via PahlawanitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ari Putri HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurma AiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The effectiveness of socrative and kahoot to teach grammar to students with different interest</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Maesaroh, Maesaroh</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Anggani Linggar Bharati, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aimed at examining the effectiveness of socrative and kahootto teach grammar to students with different interest. The objectives of the study are, to analyze high and low interest students’ score of grammar in order to explain the effectiveness of socrative, to analyze high and low interest students’ score of grammar in order to explain the effectiveness of kahoot, to analyze the significant difference between the students with high interest after taught by using Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar, to analyze the significant difference between the students with low interest after taught by using Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar, to analyze how the interaction is among teaching, students’ interest and grammar. It was an experimental research with 2x2 factorial design. I used questionnaire, observation and test. The data from questionnaire and grammar test is analyzed quantitatively using T-test and ANOVA.The results of this research showed that socrative to students with high and low interest (79.17 and 57.50) and kahoot to students with high and low interest (85.50 and 62.86) are effective. Mean score of kahoot multimedia was higher than socrative in teaching grammar. There was no significant interaction among multimedia, interest and students’ grammar achievement..</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/36696</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.36696</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 3 (2020): September 2020; 366-373</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/36696/15228</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>